Side-by-Side Comparison
See how AquaFunded Futures and FuturesElite compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
AquaFunded Futures
FuturesElite
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
AquaFunded Futures vs FuturesElite
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$3.6K
90% of $4K gross profit
90% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$3.6K
90% of $4K gross profit
90% Payout
AquaFunded Futures and FuturesElite both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. AquaFunded Futures charges $NaN and funds up to $750,000, while FuturesElite charges $NaN and funds up to $1,500,000. AquaFunded Futures uses a -step evaluation; FuturesElite uses steps.
FuturesElite offers a maximum allocation of $1,500,000, compared to AquaFunded Futures's $750,000. For traders focused on scaling, FuturesElite provides more room to grow.
Both AquaFunded Futures and FuturesElite have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — AquaFunded Futures uses , FuturesElite uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either AquaFunded Futures or FuturesElite.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither AquaFunded Futures nor FuturesElite currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $750,000 and $1,500,000 respectively.
Both AquaFunded Futures and FuturesElite hold a 3.8 rating on PFM. With equal scores, the firm with more reviews — AquaFunded Futures at 87 — carries the more validated result.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.