Blue Guardian FuturesvsThe Trading Pit Futures

Blue Guardian Futures and The Trading Pit Futures both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian Futures charges $NaN and funds up to $750,000, while The Trading Pit Futures charges $NaN and funds up to $750,000. Blue Guardian Futures uses a -step evaluation; The Trading Pit Futures uses steps.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and The Trading Pit Futures offer a maximum allocation of $750,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Blue Guardian Futures and The Trading Pit Futures have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian Futures uses , The Trading Pit Futures uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian Futures or The Trading Pit Futures.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian Futures nor The Trading Pit Futures currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $750,000 and $750,000 respectively.

The Trading Pit Futures holds a 5 rating from 6 reviews; Blue Guardian Futures holds a 4.2 rating from 88 reviews. The Trading Pit Futures scores higher but Blue Guardian Futures's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.