Side-by-Side Comparison
See how AquaFunded and BEM Funding compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
AquaFunded
BEM Funding
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
AquaFunded vs BEM Funding
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$720
90% of $800 gross profit
90% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$640
80% of $800 gross profit
80% Payout
AquaFunded and BEM Funding both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. AquaFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while BEM Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $200,000. AquaFunded uses a -step evaluation; BEM Funding uses steps.
AquaFunded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to BEM Funding's $200,000. For traders focused on scaling, AquaFunded provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.
Both AquaFunded and BEM Funding have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — AquaFunded uses , BEM Funding uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either AquaFunded or BEM Funding.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither AquaFunded nor BEM Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $200,000 respectively.
BEM Funding holds a 5 rating from 33 reviews; AquaFunded holds a 4.4 rating from 315 reviews. BEM Funding scores higher but AquaFunded's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.