AquaFundedvsBlue Guardian

AquaFunded and Blue Guardian both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. AquaFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. AquaFunded uses a -step evaluation; Blue Guardian uses steps.

Both AquaFunded and Blue Guardian offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both AquaFunded and Blue Guardian have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — AquaFunded uses , Blue Guardian uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either AquaFunded or Blue Guardian.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither AquaFunded nor Blue Guardian currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

AquaFunded leads on both rating (4.4) and review volume (314), making it the stronger signal of the two. Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews.