Side-by-Side Comparison
See how AquaFunded and FundedNext compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
AquaFunded
FundedNext
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
AquaFunded vs FundedNext
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$7.2K
90% of $8K gross profit
90% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$6.4K
80% of $8K gross profit
80% Payout
AquaFunded and FundedNext both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. AquaFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while FundedNext charges $NaN and funds up to $300,000. AquaFunded uses a -step evaluation; FundedNext uses steps.
AquaFunded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to FundedNext's $300,000. For traders focused on scaling, AquaFunded provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.
Both AquaFunded and FundedNext have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — AquaFunded uses , FundedNext uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either AquaFunded or FundedNext.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither AquaFunded nor FundedNext currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $300,000 respectively.
AquaFunded holds a 4.4 rating from 315 reviews; FundedNext holds a 4.3 rating from 897 reviews. AquaFunded scores higher but FundedNext's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.