Side-by-Side Comparison
See how Atmos Funded and WSFunded compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
Atmos Funded
WSFunded
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
Atmos Funded vs WSFunded
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$12.8K
80% of $16K gross profit
80% Payout
No data available
WSFunded might not offer $200K accounts
No Requirement
Atmos Funded and WSFunded both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Atmos Funded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while WSFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Atmos Funded uses a -step evaluation; WSFunded uses steps.
Both Atmos Funded and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.
Both Atmos Funded and WSFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Atmos Funded uses , WSFunded uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either Atmos Funded or WSFunded.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither Atmos Funded nor WSFunded currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.
Atmos Funded leads on both rating (4.7) and review volume (47), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 41 reviews.
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.
