Audacity CapitalvsBlue Guardian

Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Audacity Capital charges $NaN and funds up to $600,000, while Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Audacity Capital uses a -step evaluation; Blue Guardian uses steps.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared to Blue Guardian's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Audacity Capital provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.

Both Audacity Capital and Blue Guardian have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Audacity Capital uses , Blue Guardian uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Audacity Capital or Blue Guardian.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Audacity Capital nor Blue Guardian currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $600,000 and $400,000 respectively.

Audacity Capital holds a 4.2 rating from 115 reviews; Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews. Audacity Capital scores higher but Blue Guardian's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.