Side-by-Side Comparison
See how BEM Funding and Lark Funding compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
BEM Funding
Lark Funding
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
BEM Funding vs Lark Funding
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$320
80% of $400 gross profit
80% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$360
90% of $400 gross profit
90% Payout
BEM Funding and Lark Funding both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. BEM Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $200,000, while Lark Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $300,000. BEM Funding uses a -step evaluation; Lark Funding uses steps.
Lark Funding offers a maximum allocation of $300,000, compared to BEM Funding's $200,000. For traders focused on scaling, Lark Funding provides more room to grow.
Both BEM Funding and Lark Funding have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — BEM Funding uses , Lark Funding uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either BEM Funding or Lark Funding.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither BEM Funding nor Lark Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $200,000 and $300,000 respectively.
BEM Funding holds a 5 rating from 34 reviews; Lark Funding holds a 4.5 rating from 90 reviews. BEM Funding scores higher but Lark Funding's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.