Blue GuardianvsAtmos Funded

Atmos Funded and Blue Guardian both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Atmos Funded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Atmos Funded uses a -step evaluation; Blue Guardian uses steps.

Both Atmos Funded and Blue Guardian offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Atmos Funded and Blue Guardian have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Atmos Funded uses , Blue Guardian uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Atmos Funded or Blue Guardian.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Atmos Funded nor Blue Guardian currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

Atmos Funded holds a 4.7 rating from 47 reviews; Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews. Atmos Funded scores higher but Blue Guardian's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.