Blue GuardianvsBrightFunded

Blue Guardian and BrightFunded both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while BrightFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; BrightFunded uses steps.

Both Blue Guardian and BrightFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Blue Guardian and BrightFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , BrightFunded uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or BrightFunded.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor BrightFunded currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

BrightFunded holds a 4.4 rating from 132 reviews; Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews. BrightFunded scores higher but Blue Guardian's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.