Blue GuardianvsFunded Trading Plus

Blue Guardian and Funded Trading Plus both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Funded Trading Plus charges $NaN and funds up to $2,500,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; Funded Trading Plus uses steps.

Funded Trading Plus offers a maximum allocation of $2,500,000, compared to Blue Guardian's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Funded Trading Plus provides more room to grow.

Both Blue Guardian and Funded Trading Plus have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , Funded Trading Plus uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or Funded Trading Plus.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor Funded Trading Plus currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $2,500,000 respectively.

Funded Trading Plus holds a 4.3 rating from 75 reviews; Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews. Funded Trading Plus scores higher but Blue Guardian's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.