Side-by-Side Comparison
See how Blue Guardian and FundedNext compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
Blue Guardian
FundedNext
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
Blue Guardian vs FundedNext
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$340
85% of $400 gross profit
85% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$320
80% of $400 gross profit
80% Payout
Blue Guardian and FundedNext both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while FundedNext charges $NaN and funds up to $300,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; FundedNext uses steps.
Blue Guardian offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to FundedNext's $300,000. For traders focused on scaling, Blue Guardian provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.
Both Blue Guardian and FundedNext have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , FundedNext uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or FundedNext.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither Blue Guardian nor FundedNext currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $300,000 respectively.
FundedNext leads on both rating (4.3) and review volume (897), making it the stronger signal of the two. Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 247 reviews.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.