Blue GuardianvsFundingPips

Blue Guardian and FundingPips both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while FundingPips charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; FundingPips uses steps.

Both Blue Guardian and FundingPips offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Blue Guardian and FundingPips have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , FundingPips uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or FundingPips.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor FundingPips currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

FundingPips leads on both rating (4.2) and review volume (1,226), making it the stronger signal of the two. Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews.