Blue GuardianvsLark Funding

Blue Guardian and Lark Funding both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Lark Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $300,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; Lark Funding uses steps.

Blue Guardian offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to Lark Funding's $300,000. For traders focused on scaling, Blue Guardian provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.

Both Blue Guardian and Lark Funding have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , Lark Funding uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or Lark Funding.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor Lark Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $300,000 respectively.

Lark Funding holds a 4.5 rating from 90 reviews; Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews. Lark Funding scores higher but Blue Guardian's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.