Blue GuardianvsThe Trading Pit

Blue Guardian and The Trading Pit both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while The Trading Pit charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; The Trading Pit uses steps.

Both Blue Guardian and The Trading Pit offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Blue Guardian and The Trading Pit have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , The Trading Pit uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or The Trading Pit.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor The Trading Pit currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

Blue Guardian leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (246), making it the stronger signal of the two. The Trading Pit holds a 3.9 rating from 39 reviews.