Blue GuardianvsWSFunded

Blue Guardian and WSFunded both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while WSFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; WSFunded uses steps.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both Blue Guardian and WSFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , WSFunded uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or WSFunded.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor WSFunded currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

Blue Guardian leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (246), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 41 reviews.