Side-by-Side Comparison
See how Darwinex Zero and WSFunded compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
Darwinex Zero
WSFunded
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
Darwinex Zero vs WSFunded
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
No data available
Darwinex Zero might not offer $5K accounts
No Requirement
Monthly Earnings
$320
80% of $400 gross profit
80% Payout
Darwinex Zero and WSFunded both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Darwinex Zero charges $NaN and funds up to $100,000, while WSFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Darwinex Zero uses a -step evaluation; WSFunded uses steps.
WSFunded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to Darwinex Zero's $100,000. For traders focused on scaling, WSFunded provides more room to grow.
Both Darwinex Zero and WSFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Darwinex Zero uses , WSFunded uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either Darwinex Zero or WSFunded.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither Darwinex Zero nor WSFunded currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $100,000 and $400,000 respectively.
Darwinex Zero holds a 4 rating from 2 reviews; WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 41 reviews. Darwinex Zero scores higher but WSFunded's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.