Question 1

What is the main difference between Audacity Capital and FTMO?

Accepted Answer

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while FTMO offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $549 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to FTMO's $540 and $400,000.

Question 2

Which firm has the lower challenge fee?

Accepted Answer

FTMO's challenge fee of $540 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

Question 3

Which firm offers the better profit split?

Accepted Answer

FTMO offers a 80% profit split compared to Audacity Capital's 75%. Over time, that 5% gap compounds meaningfully on larger funded accounts.

Question 4

Which firm gives you access to more trading capital?

Accepted Answer

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared to FTMO's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Audacity Capital provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.

Question 5

How do the drawdown rules differ between Audacity Capital and FTMO?

Accepted Answer

Audacity Capital uses Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown, while FTMO uses Balance Based.

Question 6

How often do Audacity Capital and FTMO pay out profits?

Accepted Answer

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days; FTMO pays out every 14 days.

Question 7

Do Audacity Capital and FTMO offer a scaling plan?

Accepted Answer

Both Audacity Capital and FTMO offer a scaling plan, meaning funded traders can increase their allocation over time by hitting performance targets. This is a key long-term earning factor to consider alongside the base max allocation.

Question 8

Which firm has stronger reviews?

Accepted Answer

FTMO leads on both rating (4.5) and review volume (210), making it the stronger signal of the two. Audacity Capital holds a 4.1 rating from 110 reviews.

FTMOvsAudacity Capital

Head-to-head Breakdown

Earnings Calculator

Compare Firms