Side-by-Side Comparison
See how FundingPips and WSFunded compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
FundingPips
WSFunded
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
FundingPips vs WSFunded
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$1.6K
80% of $2K gross profit
80% Payout
Monthly Earnings
$1.6K
80% of $2K gross profit
80% Payout
FundingPips and WSFunded both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FundingPips charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while WSFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. FundingPips uses a -step evaluation; WSFunded uses steps.
Both FundingPips and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.
Both FundingPips and WSFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — FundingPips uses , WSFunded uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either FundingPips or WSFunded.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither FundingPips nor WSFunded currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.
FundingPips leads on both rating (4.2) and review volume (1,226), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 41 reviews.
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.
