Hantec TradervsFundingPips

FundingPips and Hantec Trader both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FundingPips charges $466 and funds up to $400,000, while Hantec Trader charges $599 and funds up to $400,000. FundingPips uses a 2-step evaluation; Hantec Trader uses 2 steps.

FundingPips's challenge fee of $466 is lower than Hantec Trader's $599, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a 80% profit split, so this metric is a draw. Look at payout frequency, scaling plan, and max allocation to find the real edge.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — FundingPips uses 2, Hantec Trader uses 2.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated across the two firms.

FundingPips pays out every 7 days; Hantec Trader pays out every 14 days. FundingPips offers more frequent access to your profits, which may matter if cash flow is a priority.

Both FundingPips and Hantec Trader offer a scaling plan, meaning funded traders can increase their allocation over time by hitting performance targets. This is a key long-term earning factor to consider alongside the base max allocation.

FundingPips leads on both rating (4.2) and review volume (1,211), making it the stronger signal of the two. Hantec Trader holds a 4 rating from 53 reviews.