WSFundedvsAquaFunded

The headline difference is profit split — AquaFunded offers 90% while WSFunded offers 80%. Beyond that, AquaFunded charges $279 with a max allocation of $400,000, compared to WSFunded's $529 and $400,000.

AquaFunded's challenge fee of $279 is lower than WSFunded's $529, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

AquaFunded offers a 90% profit split compared to WSFunded's 80%. Over time, that 10% gap compounds meaningfully on larger funded accounts.

Both AquaFunded and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both AquaFunded and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated across the two firms.

AquaFunded pays out every 14 days; WSFunded pays out every 10 days. WSFunded offers more frequent access to your profits, which may matter if cash flow is a priority.

Both AquaFunded and WSFunded offer a scaling plan, meaning funded traders can increase their allocation over time by hitting performance targets. This is a key long-term earning factor to consider alongside the base max allocation.

AquaFunded leads on both rating (4.4) and review volume (301), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 33 reviews.