WSFundedvsAudacity Capital

The headline difference is profit split — Audacity Capital offers 75% while WSFunded offers 80%. Beyond that, Audacity Capital charges $549 with a max allocation of $600,000, compared to WSFunded's $529 and $400,000.

WSFunded's challenge fee of $529 is lower than Audacity Capital's $549, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

WSFunded offers a 80% profit split compared to Audacity Capital's 75%. Over time, that 5% gap compounds meaningfully on larger funded accounts.

Audacity Capital offers a maximum allocation of $600,000, compared to WSFunded's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Audacity Capital provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.

Both Audacity Capital and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated across the two firms.

Audacity Capital pays out every 14 days; WSFunded pays out every 10 days. WSFunded offers more frequent access to your profits, which may matter if cash flow is a priority.

Both Audacity Capital and WSFunded offer a scaling plan, meaning funded traders can increase their allocation over time by hitting performance targets. This is a key long-term earning factor to consider alongside the base max allocation.

Audacity Capital leads on both rating (4.2) and review volume (112), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 33 reviews.