WSFundedvsBlueberry Funded

Blueberry Funded and WSFunded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blueberry Funded charges $450 and funds up to $400,000, while WSFunded charges $529 and funds up to $400,000. Blueberry Funded uses a 2-step evaluation; WSFunded uses 2 steps.

Blueberry Funded's challenge fee of $450 is lower than WSFunded's $529, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded offer a 80% profit split, so this metric is a draw. Look at payout frequency, scaling plan, and max allocation to find the real edge.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both firms use a 2-step evaluation. The difference is minimum trading days — Blueberry Funded requires 3 days per phase while WSFunded requires 4. Blueberry Funded gives more scheduling flexibility.

Both Blueberry Funded and WSFunded use Balance Equity Highest Eod drawdown rules, so there is no difference in how your loss limit is calculated across the two firms.

Blueberry Funded pays out every 14 days; WSFunded pays out every 10 days. WSFunded offers more frequent access to your profits, which may matter if cash flow is a priority.

WSFunded offers a scaling plan; Blueberry Funded does not. If growing your funded account size over time is part of your strategy, WSFunded has a structural advantage.

Blueberry Funded leads on both rating (4.1) and review volume (625), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 33 reviews.