WSFundedvsLark Funding

Lark Funding and WSFunded both offer a 80% profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Lark Funding charges $800 and funds up to $300,000, while WSFunded charges $10 and funds up to $400,000. Lark Funding uses a 1-step evaluation; WSFunded uses 1 steps.

WSFunded's challenge fee of $10 is lower than Lark Funding's $800, making it the more accessible starting point for traders watching upfront costs.

Both Lark Funding and WSFunded offer a 80% profit split, so this metric is a draw. Look at payout frequency, scaling plan, and max allocation to find the real edge.

WSFunded offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to Lark Funding's $300,000. For traders focused on scaling, WSFunded provides more room to grow.

Both Lark Funding and WSFunded have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Lark Funding uses 1, WSFunded uses 1.

Lark Funding uses Balance Based drawdown, while WSFunded uses Balance Equity Highest Eod.

Lark Funding pays out every 14 days; WSFunded pays out every 14 days.

WSFunded offers a scaling plan; Lark Funding does not. If growing your funded account size over time is part of your strategy, WSFunded has a structural advantage.

Lark Funding leads on both rating (4.5) and review volume (90), making it the stronger signal of the two. WSFunded holds a 3.8 rating from 33 reviews.