CEO
Country

Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.1
235
total reviews
5
144
4
43
3
14
2
1
1
33
4.1
235
4.1
235
25% off all accounts
4.1
235
25% off all accounts
Traders frequently mention Blue Guardian's straightforward rules, responsive support team (with specific moderators like AMG, BARMS, RAB, Nat, and ibro called out positively), competitive pricing, and fast payout processing—often within 12–48 hours. The dashboard interface is praised for being clean and beginner-friendly, and many appreciate that news trading and EAs are permitted. Tight spreads on instruments like gold and the 90% profit split on certain accounts are recurring positives....
Reviews9
Sort by
PakistanReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
Instant
N/A
0
nothing
Lack of Flexibility in Manual Verification: Refusing straightforward human verification steps (like a 2-minute live video call) when automated tools fail creates an unnecessary brick wall for legitimate traders. Boilerplate Support Responses: Front-line support using pre-written "Third-Party KYC" flags or canned text without looking into the actual proof provided (holding selfies, liveness tests) erodes trust very quickly. Unnecessary Delay and Escalation: Forcing traders to wait multiple days and rely on public review platforms just to get a simple identity check escalated to human management turns a routine payout process into a stressful ordeal.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Unfair Third-Party KYC rejection (Automated SumSub error on Urdu CNIC)
Summary
False 'Third-Party KYC' rejection and payout denial. The firm's automated system (SumSub) failed to process my official Pakistani National Identity Card (CNIC) due to the Urdu script. Despite me passing the 3D Liveness Test, providing high-resolution ID photos, and offering a live video call verification with my original government ID, Blue Guardian falsely accused me of Third-Party KYC and officially denied my verification and payout.
Documents From Reporter
IndiaReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
Instant
N/A
0
Good firm they allow martigle,grid, layering so this is my favourite strategy they have no issues but they , but rejected my payout hold 10+ days and give reason account sharing and post on X they said couldn't know platform because I'm said before interview I do not speaking English and understand I'm use Google translate but they can't understand because 8 have skills to proven but they need good speak rather than good trader please give need solution
I do like hold my payout and they give solution real time Because a trader they spend money firm they did it lot of hard work and than rejected there payout only launguage problem this not right
4.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Only launguage problem, understand
Summary
They have no reason to block they create reason on live kyc , said account shared and if i post on x they say couldn't know about platform so if i trader only launguage problem understand and speak because I'm live India, hindi our national and country launguage but ok I have all proof but why they can't look my dashboard and account trading history
Documents From Reporter
ThailandReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
Instant
N/A
0
-
-
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Guardian Shield Soft Breach & Incorrect Payout Math
Summary
I requested a $388.48 payout with 0/2 breaches. After requesting, my status changed to 0/1 breaches for a 1% floating loss despite zero new trades. After 80% split, 2% fee, and valid -$45.66 Tick Scalping deduction, my correct payout should be $258.90. Even with an invalid 50% soft breach penalty ($129.45), only $68.94 was deposited. The 50% breach was fabricated post-withdrawal, and the final payout math is wrong.
Documents From Reporter
IndiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
Instant
N/A
0
Now Nothing
Unjustified breach to reject payout , Manipulation and Marketing by promises
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
CID device match
Summary
Overview & Summary of Loss Primary Account: $50,000 Instant Standard Account (#491687) Secondary Account: $10,000 1-Step Pro Account (#503550) Denied Funds: $1,040 USD (Primary Payout) +430 dollars Reason: They denied ,They found cid Device match ,The submitted account numbers are one of them is Goatfunded trader account live , one account is already breached 5k starter account 2 months before, Breached 2 accounts with profits without no reasons , So Need payouts + refunds for my accounts They are highly marketing their firm but don't Be fooled detailed review i already shared with proofs
Documents From Reporter
United KingdomReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
Instant
N/A
0
Nothing about the prop firm
I don't like anything about the prop firm
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Device sharing
Summary
They say I used a different device in trading But I only traded with my laptop and phone
Documents From Reporter
YemenReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
Instant
N/A
0
The trading platform interface and execution speed are decent. However, these positives are completely overshadowed by their unfair compliance policies and their refusal to honor legitimate payouts
Their 'Shared Device' policy. Their lack of transparency and refusal to acknowledge logical explanations make them an unreliable and untrustworthy firm
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Unjustified account ban due to a 'Shared Device' violation
Summary
Blue Guardian banned my account (#440702) and denied my $660 payout, claiming a 'Shared Device' violation. I provided clear proof that I purchased this device as pre-owned, and there is a 3-month gap between the previous owner's activity and mine. There was absolutely no simultaneous or overlapping trading. Their compliance team acknowledged the 3-month gap but refused to lift the ban, enforcing a predatory policy that penalizes traders for pre-owned hardware, even when there is no actual security risk or account connection.
Documents From Reporter
CanadaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
1 Step
Less than 1 month
0
1
see detailed summary
see detailed summary
3.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Failed Interview
Summary
Payout Denial and Unjustified Breach - see detailed summary
Documents From Reporter
UkraineReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$200K
2 Steps
1 year +
8
5
Support was good.
4.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
3.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Reverse Trading
Summary
Accused of reverse trading without any evidence.
Documents From Reporter
PakistanReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$200K
2 Steps
N/A
0
trading conditions
.
2.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
3rd party trading
Summary
Denied me a payout telling me that I was using 3rd party trading with an excel file with account IDs
Documents From Reporter
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.