FundingPips Reviews

I can confirm the firm is trusted and easy to work with, I was able to trade efficiently without issue and passed my evals additionally receiving a payout at the end the rules are solid too.

Funding pips rules the CFD space, the timing of their payouts are insane, + introducing new things regularly for traders, only firm I can trust in CFD space

Experience with Funding Pips are too good and their updates and their funding Pips 2step flex account are too best for me. I pass one at master account and one at second phase. And I Breached cause of over trading, greed.and FOMO.

First of all, I would like to say that funding pips is the best prop firm I have ever traded with so far although I lost the account, but I had received payouts without any denial and soon buying a new one

One of the best prop firms out there. ❤️‍🔥 Thank you for your existence and for giving traders like me the opportunity to prove ourselves. What started with a $10K account has turned into $25K+ in total payouts in less than one year. 🤯💰 It’s honestly crazy to look back and see how far this journey has come. There have been plenty of losses, setbacks, stressful days, and moments where I questioned everything—but staying consistent, trusting my edge, managing risk, and continuing to show up made the difference. I’m genuinely grateful for the opportunity and everything I’ve learned along the way. This journey has taught me that you don’t need to win every trade—you just need to stay disciplined and let the edge play out over time. Here’s to many more payouts, bigger accounts, and hopefully an even crazier journey ahead. 🥂📈 $10K → $25K+ payouts in under a year. Still just getting started

I'm using funding pips around a year and i have breached 5 accounts of them all in second phase still not funded with them But definitely will try again and get funded with them one of my friend is funded and have taken payouts with FP once he breached his account in master account with some profit but funding pips gave his profit to him and then breached his account actually a good firm.

Passed a 2-Step Standard evaluation, got a Master Account, and received a real payout from it — no issues, no warnings. One week later, right before a much larger payout was due, the account was permanently terminated over a "Device ID match" report. I asked their Responsible Trading Team three separate times to either point to the exact clause I supposedly broke, show actual evidence of a prohibited action on that account, or reverse the decision. Never got an answer to any of the three — just "decision is final," repeated by different agents. If you're approaching a large payout, know that this can happen with no real explanation given, even after months of clean trading and a documented payout history.

I mean when i was first introduced into propfirms, my first ever firm was fundingpips and when i requested the payout at very first account i was in fear. But got my first ever payout on same day and literally i traded like i was trading in a broker while i didn't know enough rules that other firms made hidden like martingale, margin rules etc etc.. But fundingpips didn't have one. So getting first payout on fundingpips was the best experience I've so far.

My first successful prop. Good prop, successful first payout!! Transparent rules to follow. Would hope for a better scaling program in the future though.

I took my first trade on a 1-step flex funded challenge, got stopped out on XAUUSD with some slippage (normal, I don't dispute that), and my MT5 trade history shows a realised loss of $2,932 - under the 3% ($3,000) Daily Loss Limit. My account was still permanently closed for an alleged breach of $3,040, based entirely on an internal "floating equity" figure that only ever existed on their servers. Here's the specific problem I raised with support, which they never actually answered across three replies: My stop loss was set at 4,376.48. Their own dashboard shows the "breach price" as 4,375.39 - a price BELOW my stop loss. My order then filled at 4,375.57 - a HIGHER price than their own stated breach price. If price genuinely traded down to 4,375.39 (which is what triggered their breach, on their account), a resting stop order should fill at or near that point, not at a better price afterwards. Their own numbers describe a sequence that doesn't match normal order execution logic, and when I asked them directly to explain the mechanics, I got the same explanation restated three times: that equity is monitored on a floating basis, not final realized loss. When I asked for the tick-by-tick price data or the equity log to actually verify the breach, they refused to provide it, stated there was "no issue," and closed the escalation with no route to a dealing/risk team. I understand slippage happens, I understand daily loss limits are calculated on floating equity rather than closed P&L. What I'm disputing is that FundingPips has provided zero verifiable evidence for a specific, internally inconsistent breach claim, has refused a reasonable request for the underlying data, and has permanently closed my account and forfeited my challenge fee on that basis. If you're considering FundingPips, be aware that if you're closed out on a marginal breach, you have no way to verify the numbers they give you, and no independent recourse if you disagree.