FundingPips Reviews

My experience with FundingPips is good neither in terms of rules, support team, withdrawals Honestly everything is good, I've never had any problems with them

I’m leaving a 3star review because, although my overall experience with Funding Pips was going well, I had two separate trades negatively affected by extremely high overnight spreads. On two different occasions, trading two different indices, the overnight spread widened significantly enough to trigger my stop loss. I trade the same markets across multiple platforms and accounts, and neither of these trades hit my stop loss anywhere else—only on Funding Pips. Both trades would have ultimately moved in my favor had they not been stopped out due to the spread widening. I understand that spreads can widen during overnight hours and periods of lower liquidity, but in these cases, the difference was excessive compared with what I experienced on other platforms at the same time. Unfortunately, having this happen twice has significantly affected my confidence in trading with Funding Pips and made me lose my account, which is why I’m giving them 3 stars.

I passed both evaluation phases (Phase 1 and Phase 2) through genuine, independent trading, putting in real time, effort, and money along the way. Just as I was about to receive my funded/live account, FundingPips terminated my account, claiming the "Device ID" (CID) on my account matched another registered user's, and that this "may indicate" shared device access or coordinated trading. I responded right away, explained I use my own separate, genuine device, and offered full cooperation — device details, IMEI information, and a live video call where I could show my physical device and log into my account in real time for their team to verify directly. I had nothing to hide. Instead, FundingPips just pointed back to an internal report and called the decision "final." They wouldn't disclose any specific evidence beyond the Device ID match, wouldn't explain their detection methodology, and declined the live verification call outright, saying it "would not change the findings" — even though it would have cost them nothing and could have resolved the matter conclusively. I exchanged many emails with their team, laying out my case respectfully each time. Their replies got shorter and shorter until they stopped responding altogether — no further explanation, just silence after repeatedly calling it "final." This didn't feel like a genuine, two-sided investigation. It felt like a one-sided internal decision based on a report I had no way to verify, with every offer of real cooperation on my end declined. If a firm is confident enough in a finding to end a trader's shot at a funded account, it should be confident enough to verify it properly with that trader. Sharing this so other traders evaluating FundingPips know what to expect: don't count on a genuine back-and-forth review, even when you offer full cooperation repeatedly.

The trading conditions here are pretty reasonable. Execution speed is decent and spreads on majors and Gold are fair. Customer support is active and answered my questions without taking forever. Rules are transparent enough, so no real complaints so far.

Very Disappointing Experience with FundingPips My account #20523615 was terminated by FundingPips due to an alleged CID issue, and this happened only when I requested a $1,300 withdrawal. Both my wife and I are traders and have been trading for around four years. My wife previously had an account with FundingPips, which was terminated in June 2026 following a slippage-related issue, her withdrawal was also not paid. After that, I started using her old mobile phone for my own trading. Using that device, I successfully completed Phase 1 and Phase 2 of my FundingPips account. During the entire evaluation process, FundingPips did not raise any CID concern. However, as soon as I became eligible for a payout and submitted a $1,300 withdrawal request, FundingPips suddenly flagged a CID match and terminated my account. This raises a serious question: If the CID/device connection was against their rules, why was it not detected or raised during Phase 1 or Phase 2? Why did it become an issue only when a payout was requested? Also, my wife has not traded with FundingPips since June 2026, so there was no simultaneous trading between our accounts at the time of my evaluation or payout request. Based on my experience, I find this extremely unfair and concerning. Traders invest significant time, effort, and money into passing these evaluations, and rules should be enforced consistently from the beginning—not only when a trader requests a payout. I would strongly advise traders to be extremely cautious before using FundingPips. Account: #20523615

Very fast and friendly support, And after passing phase 1,man,their speed of issuing a next account, superb fundingpips. Plus one the thing that i like the most is their live support. Any queries or doubts related to the accounts, they gave you a response or a solution within minutes

My first experience with Funded Pips was unfortunately not a good one, despite the company having a very strong reputation and excellent customer support. The biggest issue for me was the trading conditions, especially the spreads. I repeatedly experienced situations where my stop loss was triggered and price then moved directly toward my original take-profit level. This happened frequently enough that it became very frustrating and, from my perspective, did not feel like I was getting a fair trading opportunity. I noticed this particularly during the second phase of the challenge, and I am not sure whether the issue was related to the trading platform or the execution conditions. I also found the dashboard frustrating because the account information and updates were not always reflected immediately. The delays in updating the dashboard made it difficult to know the exact status of my account in real time. Another concern was the relatively high commissions when combined with the spreads. In my opinion, the overall trading cost becomes quite significant, especially for a trader who is already dealing with wide or inconsistent spreads. On the positive side, the customer support team was very helpful, understanding, and professional whenever I contacted them. Funded Pips also has an excellent reputation in the prop trading industry, which is one of the reasons I decided to try the firm in the first place. However, based on my personal experience, the trading conditions and platform/dashboard performance were disappointing. As a first experience with the firm, I did not feel that I received the fair and consistent trading environment I was expecting.

Funding Pips is an excellent prop firm with unbeatable prices. They also have a user-friendly trading platform. I received my credentials quickly because their customer service is responsive. I highly recommend Funding Pips to anyone interested in prop firm trading.

My experience with Funding Pips has been extremely disappointing. I purchased a $5,000 Zero Account and made almost $320 in just a few days. I was trading with Stop Losses in place and carefully managing my risk from the beginning. However, this is where I encountered a Funding Pips rule that, in my opinion, is extremely unfair to traders. The company has a rule stating that the current loss on open positions must not exceed $50. I had open trades, and each one had a Stop Loss set in advance. If the trades had been closed at my Stop Loss levels, the total loss would have been approximately -$46 — meaning I was completely within the company’s $50 limit. Then a sudden price movement occurred. The price reached my Stop Loss levels, but the positions did not close at that exact moment. The price moved slightly further, and the floating loss briefly showed approximately -$52/-$53. Shortly afterward, the trades were closed. And this is the most important part: the final realized loss shown in my trade history was -$46. Despite this, Funding Pips closed my account, claiming that the floating loss had exceeded $50 during the price movement. So this creates a very strange situation: I calculated my risk correctly. I placed Stop Losses. The maximum planned loss according to my Stop Losses was around $46. The actual realized loss after the trades were closed was $46. Yet my account was still closed because, for a brief moment, the floating loss showed -$52/-$53. Essentially, this means that even a properly placed Stop Loss does not protect a trader from violating Funding Pips’ rule. If, because of a sudden market movement, the price briefly moves beyond the Stop Loss, the floating loss can exceed the company’s limit — and the trader can lose the entire account even though the risk they planned in advance was within the rules. I contacted support and tried to explain the situation. Their response was simple: at some point, the price showed a loss greater than $50, therefore it was a violation and the account had to be closed. In my opinion, this approach is completely disproportionate. If the company sets a $50 loss limit, traders should clearly understand what exactly constitutes a violation: the actual realized loss after the trade is closed, or a temporary floating P&L value during a sudden market movement? If it is the latter, this should be made absolutely clear and transparent before purchasing an account, because in that case, a normal Stop Loss does not actually guarantee that you will remain within the loss limit. I cannot claim that Funding Pips intentionally caused this price spike or deliberately did anything against me. I have no evidence of that. But the result is clear: I made almost $320, traded with Stop Losses, the actual realized loss on the disputed trades was $46, and yet my $5,000 account was closed because the floating loss temporarily showed -$52/-$53. After this experience, I cannot recommend Funding Pips to other traders. Before purchasing an account, I strongly recommend carefully reviewing not only the permitted loss amount, but also how the company handles floating losses, slippage, sudden price movements, and Stop Loss execution. Because in my case, it turned out that you can manage your risk properly, place an appropriate Stop Loss, and still lose your entire account because of a temporary floating loss that exceeded the limit by just a few dollars.

I am sharing my experience because I have recently received a permanent account termination from FundingPips based on a “CID Match Investigation Report”. According to the report, the same CID was associated with my two accounts and one account belonging to another registered user in Pakistan. I have never accessed, operated, or shared the other user's account. I contacted FundingPips and specifically asked them to clarify what the CID represents, how it is generated, and what technical evidence establishes that a CID match means that the same person operated the accounts. FundingPips replied that they cannot disclose the technical parameters, underlying identifiers, detection methodology, system logic, login timestamps, IP addresses, device information, or other technical evidence. They stated that the decision is final and cannot be reversed. For clarity, I used the MT5 Web Terminal through my browser and did not use an installed desktop MT5 terminal for these accounts. I am not claiming that the CID match itself is technically false. My concern is that I have been permanently penalized based on a technical identifier whose meaning and relationship to actual account ownership/operator activity are not disclosed to me. I would like to know whether other traders have experienced the same situation and whether anyone has been able to resolve a FundingPips Device ID/CID match when they genuinely did not access another user's account. I can provide the CID report and FundingPips correspondence to the platform for verification.