FundingPips Reviews

FundingPips permanently terminated my account, claiming that my Device ID matched another registered user. I strongly dispute this allegation because I have only ever used my own personal devices and have never shared my account or accessed anyone else’s account. During my appeal, I repeatedly requested evidence or a technical explanation for this allegation. FundingPips refused to provide any evidence and only sent generic responses stating that the decision was final. My appeal was never meaningfully addressed. To make matters worse, the original violation notice came from a no-reply email address, while support instructed me to contact the team responsible for the decision. This left me with no effective way to communicate with the decision-makers. Based on my experience, the process was completely lacking in transparency and fairness. I was permanently banned without being given any evidence to support the accusation or a genuine opportunity to defend myself. I cannot recommend this firm to other traders.

Receive a free 1k instant account from their giveaway which they recently held, made me complete kyc even before claiming the free account and when I completed the profit target they told me to complete the kyc again and rejected it saying multiple accounts have done kyc , cannot request payout, closed my account and now not even replying quickly. If kyc was such a big issue why did the system let me complete it while claiming it and why made me redo it just when I completed profit target.

I got an instant 1k$ giveaway but I didn't get the credentials, I was told to wait 24 hours, after I waited it was still the same, and I came back to ask what happened but I was accused of having participated in the previous giveaway, and I denied that I had never participated, and he said that the account had run out, even though there were people who got more than 1 account, if so why was I told to wait 24 hours?

Extremely disappointing experience with FundingPips. I purchased a 1-Step account on May 10, 2026, intending to use EAs on my own dedicated VPS. After my purchase, FundingPips significantly changed its VPN/VPS rules, and their support gave me contradictory answers about whether a legitimate dedicated VPS was allowed. I was then told the new restrictions also applied to existing accounts. When I requested a refund because these changes directly affected how I intended to use the service, my request was denied. Even worse, shortly after requesting the refund, my account was banned. Changing important rules after a purchase, providing inconsistent information, refusing a refund, and then banning a customer shortly after they request one is completely unacceptable. Based on my experience, I have completely lost trust in FundingPips and cannot recommend them.

nice prop firm nice platform rules is fine A wide selection of challenges Fair laws Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear.

I was a client of this prop firm for about a year, and overall my experience was positive. The spreads were good, order execution was solid, and communication with support was professional. I successfully passed the evaluation and received a $50,000 live account. Recently, however, the firm introduced a new rule for existing two-phase accounts: a maximum of 2% risk per trade. At first glance, this sounds like a good risk management rule. In practice, though, it means that if your loss on a single trade exceeds around 1.2% because of slippage, your account can be terminated. In today’s markets, where unexpected news can move prices instantly, this creates a serious problem. A headline from someone like Trump or any other major market-moving event can cause significant slippage, meaning your stop loss may not be filled where you expected. Unfortunately, that’s exactly what happened to me. My planned risk was within the limit, but the market moved so quickly that the actual loss exceeded it, and my account was closed. I understand why the company introduced this rule—it’s a business decision, and they have the right to manage their risk. However, applying such a significant rule change to already existing accounts has greatly reduced my confidence in the firm. It also raises an important question: what guarantees are there that similar rule changes won’t be introduced later for other account types, such as Flex accounts? Because of this, I don’t plan to purchase any more accounts here while there are other prop firms with more stable and predictable policies. It’s disappointing because my experience had been positive until this change. Based on my experience, I cannot recommend spending your time or money here if you have access to other established prop firms with more consistent rules.

This will going to be my alternative to 5ers since they are encountering various issues and delays right now. Glad that FundingPips has set the bar for a trusted firm

I am submitting this review/dispute because FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device ID change/device sharing breach, despite the fact that their support had previously confirmed in writing that my VPS with static IP setup was compliant under their VPS policy exception. The timeline is the main issue. I used the same VPS/static IP setup across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account. Before placing trades on the Master account, I asked FundingPips support about this setup and received written confirmation that it was acceptable. My last trading activity on the Master account was on 29 June, with only 4 trades total. I had no trading activity after that because I was traveling. The ban email arrived on 8 July, more than a week after the last trade. FundingPips has not explained how a device sharing breach supposedly occurred during a period when the account was inactive. I asked support what exactly triggered the decision, but I was not provided logs, screenshots, device details, linked account details, or any concrete evidence. Two support agents repeated that the decision from the responsible trading team was final, without addressing the prior VPS approval or the timeline. I can provide supporting documents, including the chat where the VPS/static IP setup was approved, the ban email showing the date and stated reason, trade/account history showing the last activity date, and support chats where I asked for clarification. I believe the ban was unreasonable and not transparently justified based on the information provided to me.

they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.

I attempted the FundingPips challenge but unfortunately failed. I was trading and hit the maximum daily drawdown, which I later realized was partly due to high spreads during a news event that I wasn't aware was happening at the time. The daily drawdown limit was triggered and my account was closed. Looking back, I should have been more careful about checking the economic calendar and understanding how spreads can widen during volatile periods. The rules around drawdown are clearly stated, but I didn't pay enough attention to how news events could impact my positions. On the positive side, the platform itself worked well during my trading, execution was smooth, and the dashboard made it easy to track my progress. Customer support was also helpful when I had questions about the rules. My advice to others would be to thoroughly read all the rules, especially around drawdown calculations, and always check for upcoming news events before placing trades. It's a tough lesson, but a valuable one.