FundingPips Reviews

Oh my i love fundingpips they prioritize their customers, theirs support system is great, their rule are clear and simple ,they have paid more people i know

This is the first trading firm on the world of financial markets, for it's new customers support , for clear rules less challenge fees and quick payout

I have purchased several accounts from Funding Pips over time, and I’ve even received a live account once. Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to reach the payout stage, but I hope God blesses me with the opportunity to achieve a payout in the future. Overall, the firm is excellent, and my experience has been very positive. Their customer support is also responsive, professional, and helpful. I look forward to continuing my journey with Funding Pips. ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

They firm has a user friendly interface and then easy to follow rules.... time me they have the best deals and prices compared to other firms. Discounts makes me love them more

It's a good prom firm with good customer care and good trading conditions with spread, no slippage, and execution. I like them because the trading conditions are good.

Funding Pips is one of the best prop firms I’ve used so far. I really love the affordable pricing, trader-friendly rules that perfectly suit my strategy. Funding Pips has truly made it possible for traders to grow and earn consistently even with low starting capital. Their platform experience has been smooth, reliable, and professional from my personal experience. Definitely a well-deserved 5-star rating from me. Thank you very much, Funding Pips, for creating such an amazing opportunity for traders worldwide.

This is my fourth account with funding pips thou i havent reach the payout phase yet but the firm is good and i know a couple of people who have made payout from funding pips

The Dispute Summary: FundingPips terminated my account for a violation of the Risk Per Trade Idea (3%) rule via their 10-Minute Rule. Their public website states that "Opening a new position in the same direction within 10 minutes after closing a losing trade is considered part of the same trade idea". I strictly followed the literal, public wording of this rule. However, FundingPips applied an unannounced backend server logic that they call "sequential chaining" or "bridge trading." Here is what occurred: My Trade 1 and Trade 5 were executed hours apart from each other. Trade 2 was opened within 10 minutes of Trade 1 closing. Trade 3 was opened within 10 minutes of Trade 2 closing. Trade 4 was opened within 10 minutes of Trade 3 closing. Trade 5 was opened within 10 minutes of Trade 4 closing. FundingPips claims that because of these intermediate, linking trades, Trade 1 is connected all the way to Trade 5 into one infinite, rolling chain, despite the massive time gap between them. The Core Issues Nowhere on their public website, FAQs, or Terms of Service does it state that Trade 1 can be connected to a 5th trade if there are linking trades between them. The public documentation only outlines a simple, direct relationship between two sequential trades. It never explains that a position taken hours later can be linked back to the very first trade of the day if there are intermediate/linking trades between them. Admission of Ambiguity: During our email thread, FundingPips representative S. Rehman explicitly admitted in writing that their public text lacks clarity, stating: "Your feedback regarding the wording and clarity of the public explanation has been noted and will be shared internally... for future consideration and transparency improvements." Financial Loss: Because their system triggered a premature, automated hard breach, it forcefully liquidated my final position (Trade 5). That trade immediately went on to hit my original take-profit target perfectly, costing me an additional $280 in legitimate profit. My Ultimatum to FundingPips I have given FundingPips a clear, professional ultimatum: Path A: Provide a single direct screenshot of where this "bridging/chaining" logic—connecting Trade 1 to Trade 5 via intermediate trades—is explicitly written on their website, and I will instantly accept the loss. Path B: If they cannot produce proof that this specific rule is publicly documented, they must restore my Master account and credit the $280 in wrongfully liquidated profit. Instead of providing proof, their support desk continues to cycle through repetitive, copy-pasted text explanations of how their backend server functions, entirely ignoring the fact that this multi-trade chaining logic is completely missing from their public terms. Enforcing unwritten backend rules while explicitly admitting that the public documentation lacks clarity is an unfair commercial practice.

slippage , spread , and liq provider is worst. My SL got hit 2 times in a row only in funding pips account and TP hit in my other firm accoint. it has happened in my previous instant account too . too much spread and slippage. not recommended.

I've been trading with fundingpips for a while now and I've never been this comfortable and confident trading a propfirm, I've really enjoyed it so far, especially their payouts.