Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
CEO
Country
Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.2
1198
total reviews
5
687
4
332
3
56
2
19
1
104
4.2
1198
20% off all accounts excluding 100K–200K 1-Step and 2-Step accounts (First order only)
4.2
1198
20% off all accounts excluding 100K–200K 1-Step and 2-Step accounts (First order only)
Reviews1198
Sort by
4.2
IndiaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
So I bought FundingPips 2 step challenge in July 2025 my first funding firm, I had good experience with this firm I passed 1-step and later failed on 2-steps. Overall I didn't face any problem with them, my friends also use this firm and get payouts.
N/A
0
Their dashboard, rules, customer support is excellent
Spreads is the only thing which I like least.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
South AfricaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$0
2 Steps
Great experience nice spread. The rules are straightforward .i did not pass but will definitely purchase another challenge. Great customer service . number 1
N/A
0
The price of the challenge
Nothing much
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
FranceReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
I just got a challenge with them and got funded without any problems, good prop firm, no hidden rules, cheap, now i will try to payout with them and see how it works
Less 1 Month
0
2
transparency and great support
nothing for the moment
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.2
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Fundingpips is best propfirm i encountered with.FundingPips offers a smooth trading experience, fast payouts, fair rules, and great support—perfect for serious traders aiming for consistent profits. One of the best prop firms! Realistic rules, fast evaluation,and reliable payout system.Trading with FundingPips feels stress-free and professional.
1 Year +
6
3
Fast payouts,Customer support.
They should enable crypto trading on weekends
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
NigeriaReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
I enjoyed the rules being set by the firm, during evaluation phase everything was going smooth, not until It got the masters account where I was breached because if a 2% max loss rule that was recently set by the firm.
1 Month +
0
3
The rules are very Favourabke most especially to scalpers.
The 2% and 3% rules set, that invalidates 5% daily loss rule on master account
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
April 22nd, 2026
Dear Mukhtar, Thank you for sharing your experience with FundingPips. We’re glad to hear that your experience during the evaluation phase was smooth and that you appreciated the structure of the rules. Regarding your Master account, please note that the 2% maximum loss rule is part of our risk management framework and applies to all active Master accounts. We understand that adjustments to rules can sometimes be challenging; however, these measures are implemented to ensure long-term account protection and sustainable trading conditions for all traders. We encourage you to review the guidelines carefully to avoid future breaches. If you need any clarification on the rules or how they apply to your account, our support team is always available to assist you. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
MoroccoReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
I have bought a 25k account and made a payout legit firm good rules and fast payouts and also good customer service even there's bit problem with delay execution sometimes and spread but overall I like it!
Less 1 Month
1
2
good rules and fast payouts
good customer service
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
MoroccoReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
I have bought a 100k account and made a payout legit firm good rules and fast payouts and also good customer service even theres bit problem with delay execution sometimes and spread but overall i like it!
N/A
0
Fast payouts
Delayed execution and spread
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
The platform is simple to navigate, trading challenge rules are transparent, and the dashboard is clean and intuitive. The transition between evaluation phases is smooth, typically taking just a few hours. Once a payout request is submitted, it is guaranteed with no uncertainty or unnecessary delay — a stark contrast to firms that deny payouts on technicalities. Many customers report receiving funds within minutes to 48 hours. FundingPips provides support through Discord, email, phone, and an AI chatbot, with the support team generally described as ...
1 Month +
0
2
the pricing is very competitive
there's a little bit of slippage
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
Taiwan, Province of ChinaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
My experience with FundingPips raises serious concerns about the transparency and fairness of their rule enforcement. I am aware of that such outcomes are ultimately discretionary also other cases where accounts were reinstated under similar circumstances, especially where contractual definitions were unclear. This makes it clear that the issue is not only the rule itself, but how it is applied. From my perspective, this raises serious concerns about consistency and fairness of fundingpips. In my case, the 3% Risk Per Trade rule was applied base...
Less 1 Month
0
2
None.
The lack of clear rule definitions in the contract, yet enforcing violations based on unclear interpretations, undermines the purpose of the agreement and raises concerns about credibility and trust.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
The account was closed due to a 3% risk breach, despite the contract not clearly defining how trades are grouped or how this rule is applied.
Summary
Lack of Clear Definition in 3% Risk Rule inside contract caused account closed – My Experience with FundingPips Master Account. I am aware of that such outcomes are ultimately discretionary also other cases where accounts were reinstated under similar circumstances, especially where contractual definitions were unclear. This makes it clear that the issue is not only the rule itself, but how it is applied. From my perspective, this raises serious concerns about consistency and fairness of fundingpips. I would like to share my experience with FundingPips, specifically regarding the 3% Risk Per Trade rule on a Master Account. While the overall platform and onboarding process are smooth, I encountered a critical issue related to the clarity and contractual definition of the 3% risk rule. In my case, I opened multiple small positions (0.02 lots) over time, with clear intervals between each entry, as part of a structured position-building strategy. These were not simultaneous entries, nor were they intended to create excessive exposure in a single moment. However, these trades were later aggregated and treated as a single “trade idea,” which resulted in a breach of the 3% Risk Per Trade rule and the closure of my Master Account. The primary concern is that the definition and application of this 3% rule were not clearly or explicitly specified in the contract. In particular, there was no precise explanation regarding: * how multiple trades are grouped into a single “trade idea” * what timeframe determines whether trades are considered one combined position * how risk is calculated across staggered entries Without these key parameters being clearly documented, the rule lacks a measurable and objective standard that traders can rely on when managing risk. From a trader’s perspective, this creates significant uncertainty. Risk management should be based on clearly defined and predictable rules. When critical elements of a rule are open to interpretation, it becomes difficult to reasonably anticipate how trades will be evaluated in practice. I fully respect the importance of strict risk control in proprietary trading firms. However, it is equally important that such rules are clearly defined within the contractual framework, so that traders can operate with full transparency and alignment. I hope this feedback highlights the importance of providing precise and well-defined rule structures, especially for key risk limits such as the 3% rule, to ensure fairness, consistency, and proper risk management for all traders.
Documents From Reporter
April 15th, 2026
Dear Patrick, Thank you for your detailed feedback. We appreciate the thoughtful way you have presented your concerns and want to address them directly. The Risk Per Trade Idea rule is not open to interpretation — it is clearly defined and publicly available in our FAQ before any account is purchased or traded. The rule covers three specific scenarios: First, single trades — the loss on any single trade must not reach the maximum Risk Per Trade Idea for your account size. Second, splitting a trade into multiple positions — if a trade is divided into smaller positions, the total combined loss across all those positions must not hit the limit. Third, the same trade idea — opening a new position in the same direction within 10 minutes of closing a losing trade is considered part of the same trade idea, and the combined loss must not exceed the limit. These definitions are objective and quantifiable, not discretionary. The FAQ is an extension of our trading terms and forms part of the framework all traders agree to when purchasing an account. We understand you feel the rule was unclear at the time of trading, and we are always looking at ways to improve how rules are communicated. However, the breach in your case was verified in accordance with these clearly documented rules and the decision stands. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to reach out at support@fundingpips.com. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
The great experience of using funding pips after long time and I can say they are doing great job with their perfect spread will use funding pips only for future accounts purchases
N/A
0
Their customer service top notch
There’s nothing that i like least about the company
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
