FundingPips Reviews

Title: KYC Issue Turned Into Permanent Ban – Support Was Useless My experience with FundingPips has been extremely disappointing, not just because of the KYC issue, but because of how poorly it was handled. During KYC, their system repeatedly misread my address details (e.g. “2B” as “28”, “LTG” as “LTS”), which forced me to retry submissions multiple times just to get accurate data. Instead of resolving this, my account was flagged for “duplicate applicant” and permanently restricted. The bigger issue is the support. I reached out multiple times, explained everything clearly, and even provided context about the OCR errors. However, all I received were the same repeated template responses: * “Violation confirmed” * “Decision is final” * "Unfortunately, as these are internal compliance requirements, we are unable to provide any further clarification." It felt like the support team wasn’t actually reviewing my case at all—just copying and pasting the same response regardless of what I said. They also claimed the issue was from a third-party KYC provider, but at the same time refused to escalate or request any manual review. This leaves users completely stuck when the system makes a mistake. To be clear, this was only a small 10k account. There would be no logical reason for me to attempt any kind of “cheating” on such a small account, which makes the accusation even harder to understand. Key concerns: * Faulty KYC system with OCR errors * False compliance flags triggered by retries * No transparency on what the actual violation was * Support that does not address the core issue at all I am a genuine user who followed their process exactly. Getting permanently banned without any proper explanation or second chance is unacceptable. If this is how edge cases are handled, users should be aware of the risk. Be cautious when doing KYC — system errors alone can cost you your account.

I want to warn other traders about a critical rule at FundingPips that is very easy to misunderstand in real trading. Their “2% Risk Per Trade Idea” rule is not as simple as it sounds. Like most traders, I understood this as a limit on open (floating) risk. On my first day trading the master account, I managed my positions accordingly: * Closed trades were around $600 loss * Open trades were around $1,100 floating loss * I kept my stop loss within what I believed was the 2% limit Despite this, my account was breached. Later, support explained that they combine closed losses + open losses and even group trades together as a single “trade idea” if you re-enter in the same direction within a short time (in my case, 10 minutes). This means your previous losses continue to count against you, even after trades are closed. This is not intuitive and can easily catch traders off guard—especially on a first day. What made it worse: After I posted a review on Trustpilot, they publicly said they are willing to help. I contacted support as instructed, but the response was simply that the decision is final with no reconsideration. So there is a clear gap between public communication and actual outcome. I’m not against rules, but rules like this should be explained much more clearly with real examples. If you’re considering this firm, make sure you fully understand how they define “trade idea” and how losses are calculated—because what looks like controlled risk to you may be calculated very differently on their side.

fundinngpips is a very nice prop firm and i can recommend it for very tight spreads, the rules are simple and clear and a very clear dashboard that is easy to use.

funding pips is the most credible propfirm the only problem is thier spread and slippage otherwise it's a trusted firm i failed challenge because of my mistake i will suerly tried them again

I have been Using FundingPips since last 6 Months , I have tried a couple of firms , but the Flexibility and the Minimal Rules this firm provides is unmatched . NO hidden rules , No much consistency requirements, all you need to do is maintain and trade. Any beginner looking to grow and learn would find this quite helpful.

The only one which is giving payout without any issues. What I wanna say is guys lets take payout as much as we can while fundingpips is doing good things for us. Thanks fundingpips love pls grow more so that we the traders can grow more n more.

The spread is good and their dashboard user friendly U can navigate around ... customer care is good but I never talk to agent it automated... And I have not yet receive payout but looking forward in doing so

Funding pips is amongst the solid propfirm, it's generally cool trading with them simple rules and terms smooth trading environment all challenge phase and instant one good tight spread no slippages fast execution

Funding Pips has carved out a solid reputation in the prop firm space by keeping things refreshingly straightforward. If you’re looking for a platform that doesn't make you jump through bureaucratic hoops, this is a strong contender. The Good Smooth Process: From the initial signup to the intuitive dashboard, the user experience is top-tier. The onboarding is incredibly fast, and the lack of complex, hidden rules makes it easy to focus entirely on your strategy rather than deciphering fine print. Excellent Support: Their support team is notably responsive. Whether you’re reaching out via Discord or live chat, you usually get a human who actually knows the product, which is a massive relief when you have a technical query or a payout question. The Bad Trading Spreads: This is where the polish starts to wear off. While they market "institutional" conditions, the spreads—especially on minor pairs and during high volatility—can be wider than what you’d find at top-tier competitors. If your strategy relies on ultra-tight entries or scalping, these costs can noticeably eat into your profit margins over time.

THERE PLATFORM IS VERY USER FRIENDLY.NO HIDDEN RULES.The team responds to email in time incase of any mishaps. Funding pips does'nt have strict rule.