CEO
Country

Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.2
1266
total reviews
5
715
4
341
3
57
2
21
1
132
Early feedback highlights fast payout processing, with multiple traders reporting payouts completed within minutes to hours, and flexible account options at competitive entry prices. Traders appreciate the user-friendly dashboard, responsive customer support (particularly on Discord), and straightforward evaluation structure. Some note tight spreads, minimal slippage, and the recent removal of contested rules like weekend holding restrictions and profit concentration caps as...
Reviews1266
Sort by
4.2
EthiopiaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The dashboard, the price, and a decent spread during the daytime
Midnight spreads
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
NigeriaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
3 Steps
N/A
0
I like the smooth execution and fair trading conditions. The rules are clear, and the dashboard is easy to use. Support is also responsive when needed.
The drawdown rules can be a bit strict, especially during volatile markets. Also, payout processing could be slightly faster sometimes.
4.0
User Friendliness
3.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
IndiaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
Pays to a Deciplined Trader
Breached my account :)
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
MexicoReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The variety of assets that can be traded, plus low spreads
Lack of support and human attention
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
zero payout denail
minimum spread
4.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
GhanaReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
Smoth trading conditions
Good spreads and great trading conditions
3.0
User Friendliness
3.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
April 22nd, 2026
Dear Jabiru, Thank you for sharing your experience with FundingPips. We’re pleased to hear that your payout process was smooth, transparent, and processed in a timely manner. It’s great to know that the clarity of our rules, dashboard functionality, and overall reliability have contributed to a positive trading experience for you. We strongly believe in supporting disciplined traders through a fair and structured environment, so your feedback regarding consistency, risk management, and ease of payouts is highly appreciated. We value your trust and look forward to continuing to support your trading journey and future success with us. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
United KingdomReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Good prices and trading conditions
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
MoroccoReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
What stood out the most was how simple and beginner-friendly the evaluation process is. The rules are easy to understand, which makes it less stressful compared to more complex prop firms. I also liked the affordable pricing, making it accessible to traders who don’t want to risk a lot of capital upfront. Another positive point is the overall user experience — the platform runs smoothly, and getting started is quick and straightforward.
The biggest downside for me was the uncertainty around consistency and trust. Since it’s not as established as some bigger prop firms, it’s harder to fully rely on long-term stability. I also found the payout process and rules a bit unclear at times, which can be frustrating when you’re trying to scale confidently. Additionally, some of the trading conditions and restrictions felt limiting, especially if you prefer more flexible or aggressive strategies
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
AustraliaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$300K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The evaluation phase was straightforward and the platform was functional. That was the extent of the positive experience.
The willingness to use a single loosely correlated trade as a pretext to terminate a profitable account and withhold $19,000 in earned profits. The refusal to engage substantively with the rebuttal.
5.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
'Trading in concert' with others on the platform
Summary
I passed three 2-Step Challenges and was scaled to a 300k merged account (the maximum allocation). I traded it to around $19,000 in realised profit and was then banned mid-trade on an open position that was on its way to a further $11,000 in profit. They forcibly closed that position at the moment of termination. Their stated evidence for banning me was a one-page document citing a single trade out of six on the account. The trade they picked was a 1 lot XAUUSD long that tapped my stop loss at 1% for a loss. Their own data on the "match" shows a 98-second gap and a $2.17 price difference with the unknown "other account." They called this a "strong indication" of "trading in concert." The words "strong" and "similar" are doing all the work in their correspondence because the actual numbers do not support a stronger word. If there were any real pattern of trading in concert, it would show across multiple trades, especially the significantly profitable ones, where a coordinating trader would have the most reason to align. No such evidence exists. They also cited 'similar IP data' as evidence. My trades were executed from my home computer on my residential internet. For another account to share that IP, someone would have to be physically in my house using my network. No such person exists. And if they're suggesting the link was through a trade copier, no copier that exists has a 98-second latency gap. I submitted a detailed written rebuttal addressing the evidence. Their response did not engage with any of it. They simply restated the decision and said the matter "does not allow for further reconsideration."
Documents From Reporter
May 7th, 2026
Dear Igor, Thank you for sharing your experience in such detail. We recognise the effort and trading performance behind your account and we do not take decisions like this lightly. We want to address your review directly. Your account was not terminated because it became profitable. FundingPips pays out millions to traders regularly and we stand fully behind our commitment to reward successful, rule-abiding traders. The decision to terminate your account was made following a thorough investigation by our Responsible Trading Team. The evidence considered goes beyond the single trade cited in the report — it includes a matching IP address between accounts, alongside the similar trading activity. The combination of these factors, taken together, met the threshold for a violation of our trading rules. No account is terminated based on a single data point alone. We understand you have provided an explanation for the IP match and the trade timing. However, our Responsible Trading Team reviewed your appeal and the evidence in full, and the decision was upheld in accordance with our policy. We are unable to share further details of our detection methodology publicly, as this forms part of our compliance framework. Best regards, FundingPips Team"
4.2
IndiaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
no hidden rules
slippage i think
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.