CEO
Country

Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.2
1254
total reviews
5
712
4
341
3
57
2
20
1
124
4.2
1254
4.2
1254
20% off (first order, then 15% off existing users) all accounts
4.2
1254
20% off (first order, then 15% off existing users) all accounts
Traders frequently highlight FundingPips' fast payout processing, with multiple reports of payouts completed within 10-15 minutes, and competitive trading conditions including tight spreads and good execution speed. The platform's dashboard receives consistent praise for being user-friendly and easy to navigate, while customer support is generally described as responsive and helpful. Many appreciate the clear rules, flexible account options, and the 2-step evaluation structure that feels...
Reviews1254
Sort by
4.2
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
1 year +
6
3
Fast payouts,Customer support.
They should enable crypto trading on weekends
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
NigeriaReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
1 month +
0
3
The rules are very Favourabke most especially to scalpers.
The 2% and 3% rules set, that invalidates 5% daily loss rule on master account
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
April 22nd, 2026
Dear Mukhtar, Thank you for sharing your experience with FundingPips. We’re glad to hear that your experience during the evaluation phase was smooth and that you appreciated the structure of the rules. Regarding your Master account, please note that the 2% maximum loss rule is part of our risk management framework and applies to all active Master accounts. We understand that adjustments to rules can sometimes be challenging; however, these measures are implemented to ensure long-term account protection and sustainable trading conditions for all traders. We encourage you to review the guidelines carefully to avoid future breaches. If you need any clarification on the rules or how they apply to your account, our support team is always available to assist you. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
MoroccoReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
2
good rules and fast payouts
good customer service
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
MoroccoReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Fast payouts
Delayed execution and spread
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
1 month +
0
2
the pricing is very competitive
there's a little bit of slippage
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
Taiwan, Province of ChinaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
0
2
None.
The lack of clear rule definitions in the contract, yet enforcing violations based on unclear interpretations, undermines the purpose of the agreement and raises concerns about credibility and trust.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
The account was closed due to a 3% risk breach, despite the contract not clearly defining how trades are grouped or how this rule is applied.
Summary
Lack of Clear Definition in 3% Risk Rule inside contract caused account closed – My Experience with FundingPips Master Account. I am aware of that such outcomes are ultimately discretionary also other cases where accounts were reinstated under similar circumstances, especially where contractual definitions were unclear. This makes it clear that the issue is not only the rule itself, but how it is applied. From my perspective, this raises serious concerns about consistency and fairness of fundingpips. I would like to share my experience with FundingPips, specifically regarding the 3% Risk Per Trade rule on a Master Account. While the overall platform and onboarding process are smooth, I encountered a critical issue related to the clarity and contractual definition of the 3% risk rule. In my case, I opened multiple small positions (0.02 lots) over time, with clear intervals between each entry, as part of a structured position-building strategy. These were not simultaneous entries, nor were they intended to create excessive exposure in a single moment. However, these trades were later aggregated and treated as a single “trade idea,” which resulted in a breach of the 3% Risk Per Trade rule and the closure of my Master Account. The primary concern is that the definition and application of this 3% rule were not clearly or explicitly specified in the contract. In particular, there was no precise explanation regarding: * how multiple trades are grouped into a single “trade idea” * what timeframe determines whether trades are considered one combined position * how risk is calculated across staggered entries Without these key parameters being clearly documented, the rule lacks a measurable and objective standard that traders can rely on when managing risk. From a trader’s perspective, this creates significant uncertainty. Risk management should be based on clearly defined and predictable rules. When critical elements of a rule are open to interpretation, it becomes difficult to reasonably anticipate how trades will be evaluated in practice. I fully respect the importance of strict risk control in proprietary trading firms. However, it is equally important that such rules are clearly defined within the contractual framework, so that traders can operate with full transparency and alignment. I hope this feedback highlights the importance of providing precise and well-defined rule structures, especially for key risk limits such as the 3% rule, to ensure fairness, consistency, and proper risk management for all traders.
Documents From Reporter
April 15th, 2026
Dear Patrick, Thank you for your detailed feedback. We appreciate the thoughtful way you have presented your concerns and want to address them directly. The Risk Per Trade Idea rule is not open to interpretation — it is clearly defined and publicly available in our FAQ before any account is purchased or traded. The rule covers three specific scenarios: First, single trades — the loss on any single trade must not reach the maximum Risk Per Trade Idea for your account size. Second, splitting a trade into multiple positions — if a trade is divided into smaller positions, the total combined loss across all those positions must not hit the limit. Third, the same trade idea — opening a new position in the same direction within 10 minutes of closing a losing trade is considered part of the same trade idea, and the combined loss must not exceed the limit. These definitions are objective and quantifiable, not discretionary. The FAQ is an extension of our trading terms and forms part of the framework all traders agree to when purchasing an account. We understand you feel the rule was unclear at the time of trading, and we are always looking at ways to improve how rules are communicated. However, the breach in your case was verified in accordance with these clearly documented rules and the decision stands. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to reach out at support@fundingpips.com. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Their customer service top notch
There’s nothing that i like least about the company
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
Dominican RepublicReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Friendly website
Challenge
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
Syrian Arab RepublicReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The account rates are reasonable and good, the daily and total losses are consistently good, they don't reject withdrawal requests, they have promotions every few weeks, and it's a very good company.
Slippage is rather bad, and spreads are high in some currencies. You also can't copy trades between companies with the same name.
4.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
3.0
Customer Care
2.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
AlgeriaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
N/A
0
What I liked most about Funding Pips is the ease of use and clarity of their trading challenges. The platform is simple to navigate, the rules are transparent, and customer support is very responsive. I also appreciated the fast and reliable withdrawals, which make the overall experience smooth and trustworthy
What I liked least about Funding Pips is that some processes, like account verification, can take longer than expected. Occasionally, it felt a bit slow when waiting for approvals, but overall the experience was positive.
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.