Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
CEO
Country
Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.2
1198
total reviews
5
687
4
332
3
56
2
19
1
104
4.2
1198
20% off all accounts excluding 100K–200K 1-Step and 2-Step accounts (First order only)
4.2
1198
20% off all accounts excluding 100K–200K 1-Step and 2-Step accounts (First order only)
Reviews1198
Sort by
4.2
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Fundingpips is the best propfirm it has minimum rules just a little problem with slipage during the news time it was the best propfirm i have traded many propfirms but this has the easiest rules
N/A
0
easy rules
slippage
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
IndonesiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
FundingPips permanently terminated my account, claiming that my Device ID matched another registered user. I strongly dispute this allegation because I have only ever used my own personal devices and have never shared my account or accessed anyone else’s account. During my appeal, I repeatedly requested evidence or a technical explanation for this allegation. FundingPips refused to provide any evidence and only sent generic responses stating that the decision was final. My appeal was never meaningfully addressed. To make matters worse, the origina...
N/A
0
Unfortunately, after my experience with the account termination process, I cannot honestly say there was anything I liked the most. Any positive first impression was overshadowed by the lack of transparency and fairness when my account was permanently terminated.
The worst part was the appeal process. My account was permanently terminated based on an alleged Device ID match, yet FundingPips refused to provide any evidence or technical explanation. I explained that I only used my own personal devices and requested clarification, but my questions were never answered. Instead, I received only template responses saying the decision was final. In my experience, this process lacked transparency and did not give me a fair opportunity to respond to the allegation.
3.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
2.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Alleged Device ID Match with Another Registered User(Device ID Match / Shared CID Detection)
Summary
FundingPips permanently terminated my account, stating that my Device ID matched another registered user. I strongly dispute this allegation. I have only ever accessed my account using my own personal devices: two iPhones and one iPad, all purchased brand new and owned exclusively by me. I have never shared my account, never logged into another person’s FundingPips account, and never allowed anyone else to operate my account. I submitted an appeal requesting evidence or a technical explanation of the alleged Device ID match. However, FundingPips did not provide any evidence or answer my specific questions. Instead, I received only generic responses stating that the decision was final and referring me back to the original notification. In my opinion, the appeal process lacked transparency because I was permanently banned without being given sufficient information to understand or meaningfully respond to the allegation.
Documents From Reporter
July 24th, 2026
Dear Noventa, It has been determined that the Device ID linked to your account corresponds with the Device ID of another registered user on our platform. This finding was established following a comprehensive review of the relevant technical indicators and account activity. Please also note that, for security, privacy, and data protection reasons, we are unable to disclose the identity of another user, the specific technical identifiers involved, or any information relating to another user's account. Additionally, the review has already been completed by the Responsible Trading Team, and no further independent review or appeal process is available for this case. Accordingly, the decision communicated to you is final and cannot be reversed. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
IndiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$1K
Instant
Receive a free 1k instant account from their giveaway which they recently held, made me complete kyc even before claiming the free account and when I completed the profit target they told me to complete the kyc again and rejected it saying multiple accounts have done kyc , cannot request payout, closed my account and now not even replying quickly. If kyc was such a big issue why did the system let me complete it while claiming it and why made me redo it just when I completed profit target.
N/A
0
Nothing
Nothing
4.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
July 28th, 2026
Dear Hans, Please note that all accounts are subject to our standard verification procedures and compliance checks. Completing the initial KYC process does not guarantee final approval, as additional reviews may be required at different stages, including before processing rewards. KYC rejections related to duplicate accounts or verification concerns are handled by our Compliance Team based on the information provided and the results from our verification provider. We do not have access to override or change these decisions. We recommend contacting our Support Team with your account details so they can review your case and provide further clarification regarding the verification status. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
IndonesiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$1K
Instant
I got an instant 1k$ giveaway but I didn't get the credentials, I was told to wait 24 hours, after I waited it was still the same, and I came back to ask what happened but I was accused of having participated in the previous giveaway, and I denied that I had never participated, and he said that the account had run out, even though there were people who got more than 1 account, if so why was I told to wait 24 hours?
N/A
0
Dashboard
2.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
July 28th, 2026
Dear Syahrulikhsan, Please note that, according to the screenshot provided, it appears that the 1K Instant Account has already been claimed. Kindly review the registered email address associated with your account and verify that it matches the email shown in the screenshot, as well as the name provided in the image. Once confirmed, please ensure you are contacting us with the correct account details so we can assist you further. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
ItalyReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
1 Step
Extremely disappointing experience with FundingPips. I purchased a 1-Step account on May 10, 2026, intending to use EAs on my own dedicated VPS. After my purchase, FundingPips significantly changed its VPN/VPS rules, and their support gave me contradictory answers about whether a legitimate dedicated VPS was allowed. I was then told the new restrictions also applied to existing accounts. When I requested a refund because these changes directly affected how I intended to use the service, my request was denied. Even worse, shortly after requesting ...
N/A
0
Nothing, trading wasnt that good and dashboard seems was made with ai.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
July 24th, 2026
Dear Ivan, It has been determined that the Device ID linked to your account corresponds with the Device ID of another registered user on our platform. This finding was established following a comprehensive review of the relevant technical indicators and account activity. Please also note that, for security, privacy, and data protection reasons, we are unable to disclose the identity of another user, the specific technical identifiers involved, or any information relating to another user's account. Additionally, the review has already been completed by the Responsible Trading Team, and no further independent review or appeal process is available for this case. Accordingly, the decision communicated to you is final and cannot be reversed. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
IsraelReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
nice prop firm nice platform rules is fine A wide selection of challenges Fair laws Overall experience at fundingpips was great, customer support and user dashboard are top notch, I took a 2 step challenge where the rules were clear.
N/A
0
A selection of challenges, and price
There are few promotions.
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
UkraineReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I was a client of this prop firm for about a year, and overall my experience was positive. The spreads were good, order execution was solid, and communication with support was professional. I successfully passed the evaluation and received a $50,000 live account. Recently, however, the firm introduced a new rule for existing two-phase accounts: a maximum of 2% risk per trade. At first glance, this sounds like a good risk management rule. In practice, though, it means that if your loss on a single trade exceeds around 1.2% because of slippage, your ...
3 Months +
0
2
Spreads and service
the firm's new introductions
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
July 28th, 2026
Dear Trader, Thank you for sharing your experience in such a balanced and thoughtful way, and for the positive experience you had over the past year. We want to address your specific situation. The Risk Per Trade Idea rule assesses the combined live floating loss of grouped positions at any given moment. When a major market event causes a sharp move — such as an unexpected news headline — the live floating loss can spike beyond the intended stop loss level due to slippage before the order can be filled. This is an inherent risk of holding positions during periods of extreme volatility, and unfortunately the rule assesses the peak floating loss regardless of the intended risk. We hear your concern about applying rule changes to existing accounts. The recent policy update was communicated to all traders and required mandatory acknowledgement before trading was re-enabled. We acknowledge that changes to rules on existing accounts can reduce confidence, and we take this feedback seriously. We are sorry this outcome ended what had been a positive experience, and we appreciate the fair and professional tone of your review. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
PhilippinesReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
Instant
This will going to be my alternative to 5ers since they are encountering various issues and delays right now. Glad that FundingPips has set the bar for a trusted firm
N/A
0
User friendly trading conditions
it took some time for their customer service to respond
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.2
ItalyReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I am submitting this review/dispute because FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device ID change/device sharing breach, despite the fact that their support had previously confirmed in writing that my VPS with static IP setup was compliant under their VPS policy exception. The timeline is the main issue. I used the same VPS/static IP setup across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account. Before placing trades on the Master account, I asked FundingPips support about this setup and received written confirmation that it was accep...
Less 1 Month
0
3
The only positive part of the experience was that FundingPips support initially responded to my VPS/static IP question before I traded the Master account. They confirmed in writing that the setup was acceptable under their VPS policy exception, which is why I proceeded using that same setup.
What I liked least was the lack of transparency and the refusal to engage with the timeline. FundingPips banned my funded Master account for an alleged device sharing/device ID issue, but the ban notice came more than a week after my last trade and after a period of zero account activity. Support did not provide logs, screenshots, device details, or a clear explanation of what supposedly triggered the breach. The only answer I received from multiple agents was that the decision was final, even though I had prior written approval for the VPS/static IP setup.
4.0
User Friendliness
2.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Device ID change / alleged device sharing
Summary
FundingPips stated that my Master account was breached because of a device ID change/device sharing issue. I believe this was unjustified because I used the same VPS with a static IP across Phase 1, Phase 2, and the Master account, and FundingPips support had confirmed in writing before Master account trading that this setup was compliant under their new VPS policy. The timing does not add up. My last trade on the Master account was on 29 June, with 4 trades total. I had no trading activity after that because I was traveling. The ban email arrived on 8 July, more than a week later. FundingPips has not explained how a device sharing breach could have occurred during a period when the account had no trading activity. When I asked for clarification, support did not provide logs, screenshots, device details, linked account information, or any evidence showing what triggered the decision. Multiple agents only repeated that the trading team's decision was final. I offered to provide VPS logs and supporting evidence, but they did not review or engage with that offer. Supporting documents I can upload include: the chat confirming the VPS/static IP setup was approved, the ban email dated 8 July, account/trade history showing the last trade date of 29 June, and follow-up support chats where I asked for an explanation and received only final-decision responses.
Documents From Reporter
July 27th, 2026
Dear Pietro, It has been determined that the Device ID linked to your account corresponds with the Device ID of another registered user on our platform. This finding was established following a comprehensive review of the relevant technical indicators and account activity. Please also note that, for security, privacy, and data protection reasons, we are unable to disclose the identity of another user, the specific technical identifiers involved, or any information relating to another user's account. Additionally, the review has already been completed by the Responsible Trading Team, and no further independent review or appeal process is available for this case. Accordingly, the decision communicated to you is final and cannot be reversed. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
4.2
IndiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.
N/A
0
nothing
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
cid voilation
Summary
they falsely accused of CID VOILATION ( my device is used to access other traders account which i didnt do ) when i saked for the proof the denied to give ay proof and said this is final decision.
Documents From Reporter
July 24th, 2026
Dear Abhishek, It has been determined that the Device ID linked to your account corresponds with the Device ID of another registered user on our platform. This finding was established following a comprehensive review of the relevant technical indicators and account activity. Please also note that, for security, privacy, and data protection reasons, we are unable to disclose the identity of another user, the specific technical identifiers involved, or any information relating to another user's account. Additionally, the review has already been completed by the Responsible Trading Team, and no further independent review or appeal process is available for this case. Accordingly, the decision communicated to you is final and cannot be reversed. Kind regards, FundingPips Team
