Side-by-Side Comparison
See how AquaFunded and FTMO compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
AquaFunded
FTMO
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
AquaFunded vs FTMO
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$10.8K
90% of $12K gross profit
90% Payout
No data available
FTMO might not offer $150K accounts
No Requirement
AquaFunded and FTMO both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. AquaFunded charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while FTMO charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. AquaFunded uses a -step evaluation; FTMO uses steps.
Both AquaFunded and FTMO offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.
Both AquaFunded and FTMO have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — AquaFunded uses , FTMO uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either AquaFunded or FTMO.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither AquaFunded nor FTMO currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.
FTMO holds a 4.5 rating from 213 reviews; AquaFunded holds a 4.4 rating from 315 reviews. FTMO scores higher but AquaFunded's rating is based on a larger sample. Both signals are worth considering together.
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.
