Blue GuardianvsInstant Funding

Blue Guardian and Instant Funding both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Blue Guardian charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Instant Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $1,000,000. Blue Guardian uses a -step evaluation; Instant Funding uses steps.

Instant Funding offers a maximum allocation of $1,000,000, compared to Blue Guardian's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Instant Funding provides more room to grow.

Both Blue Guardian and Instant Funding have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Blue Guardian uses , Instant Funding uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either Blue Guardian or Instant Funding.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither Blue Guardian nor Instant Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $1,000,000 respectively.

Blue Guardian holds a 4.1 rating from 246 reviews; Instant Funding holds a 4 rating from 366 reviews. Blue Guardian scores higher but Instant Funding's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.