Side-by-Side Comparison
See how Darwinex Zero and FTMO compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
Darwinex Zero
FTMO
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
Darwinex Zero vs FTMO
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
No data available
Darwinex Zero might not offer $5K accounts
No Requirement
Monthly Earnings
$360
90% of $400 gross profit
90% Payout
Darwinex Zero and FTMO both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Darwinex Zero charges $NaN and funds up to $100,000, while FTMO charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Darwinex Zero uses a -step evaluation; FTMO uses steps.
FTMO offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to Darwinex Zero's $100,000. For traders focused on scaling, FTMO provides more room to grow.
Both Darwinex Zero and FTMO have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Darwinex Zero uses , FTMO uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either Darwinex Zero or FTMO.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither Darwinex Zero nor FTMO currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $100,000 and $400,000 respectively.
FTMO leads on both rating (4.5) and review volume (213), making it the stronger signal of the two. Darwinex Zero holds a 4 rating from 2 reviews.
Reviews & Rankings
News & Insights
Tools & Resources
Programs & Rewards
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.
