Side-by-Side Comparison
See how Finotive Funding and FTMO compare on profit split, challenge fee, drawdown rules, payout frequency, and verified trader ratings — all in one place.
Max Allocation
Trader Satisfaction
Finotive Funding
FTMO
Program name
Max allocation
Platforms
Finotive Funding vs FTMO
Program name
Account size
Steps
Profit split
Payout freq.
Lowest Price
Estimate your monthly take-home based on account size and expected monthly return.
Monthly Earnings
$150
75% of $200 gross profit
75% Payout
No data available
FTMO might not offer $2.5K accounts
No Requirement
Finotive Funding and FTMO both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. Finotive Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $1,600,000, while FTMO charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. Finotive Funding uses a -step evaluation; FTMO uses steps.
Finotive Funding offers a maximum allocation of $1,600,000, compared to FTMO's $400,000. For traders focused on scaling, Finotive Funding provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.
Both Finotive Funding and FTMO have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — Finotive Funding uses , FTMO uses .
Drawdown information is not available for either Finotive Funding or FTMO.
Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.
Neither Finotive Funding nor FTMO currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $1,600,000 and $400,000 respectively.
FTMO leads on both rating (4.5) and review volume (213), making it the stronger signal of the two. Finotive Funding holds a 4.1 rating from 186 reviews.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.