FTMOvsFundingPips

FTMO and FundingPips both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FTMO charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while FundingPips charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000. FTMO uses a -step evaluation; FundingPips uses steps.

Both FTMO and FundingPips offer a maximum allocation of $400,000. Scaling plan terms and payout frequency become the deciding factors here.

Both FTMO and FundingPips have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — FTMO uses , FundingPips uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either FTMO or FundingPips.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither FTMO nor FundingPips currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $400,000 respectively.

FTMO holds a 4.5 rating from 213 reviews; FundingPips holds a 4.2 rating from 1,225 reviews. FTMO scores higher but FundingPips's rating is based on a larger sample, which adds statistical weight. Both signals are worth considering together.