FTMOvsLark Funding

FTMO and Lark Funding both offer a % profit split, so the real differentiators come down to cost, capital, and rules. FTMO charges $NaN and funds up to $400,000, while Lark Funding charges $NaN and funds up to $300,000. FTMO uses a -step evaluation; Lark Funding uses steps.

FTMO offers a maximum allocation of $400,000, compared to Lark Funding's $300,000. For traders focused on scaling, FTMO provides more room to grow — particularly if both firms offer a scaling plan.

Both FTMO and Lark Funding have no minimum trading day requirement. The only difference in evaluation length is steps — FTMO uses , Lark Funding uses .

Drawdown information is not available for either FTMO or Lark Funding.

Payout frequency data is not currently confirmed for either firm. Check each firm's profile page for the latest terms before purchasing a challenge.

Neither FTMO nor Lark Funding currently offers a scaling plan. Max allocation is fixed at $400,000 and $300,000 respectively.

Both FTMO and Lark Funding hold a 4.5 rating on PFM. With equal scores, the firm with more reviews — FTMO at 213 — carries the more validated result.