CEO
Country

United Kingdom
Trustpilot
n/a
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
n/a
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.4
1163
total reviews
5
809
4
209
3
37
2
11
1
97
4.4
1163
4.4
1163
45% off all accounts (except Alpha Pro 8% and 10% Bi-weekly)
4.4
1163
45% off all accounts (except Alpha Pro 8% and 10% Bi-weekly)
Traders consistently highlight Alpha Capital's reliable payout record, tight spreads, and clear trading rules as major strengths. Reviewers specifically praise the firm's execution speed on MT5, competitive spreads on gold and major pairs, and transparent conditions with "no hidden rules." Many note they've received multiple payouts over extended periods (some spanning 2-4 years), and the customer support—especially via Discord—receives frequent commendation for responsiveness and...
Reviews1163
Sort by
EthiopiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
3 years +
0
0
The only positive thing I can mention is that the company initially appeared professional. I passed their Risk Interview, my trading approach was reviewed, and I had previously received a payout. Unfortunately, that positive impression completely changed when my $3,180 payout was denied and all of my accounts were terminated over a disputed CID/device match. After what happened, especially considering the technical evidence I have provided from my VPS provider, it is extremely difficult for me to identify anything I genuinely like about how my case has been handled. What began as confidence in the firm has turned into serious disappointment and a complete loss of trust in their compliance and payout process.
What I liked the least was the way my case was handled after my $3,180 payout was denied and all of my accounts were permanently closed over a disputed CID/device match. I do not know the users Alpha linked to me, I never accessed or managed their accounts, and my VPS provider confirmed in writing that my VPS was never used by another customer. They also explained that some VPS template-derived identifiers can overlap across independently provisioned machines, which raises a genuine technical question about how Alpha’s CID is generated. Despite the seriousness of the consequences, I still have not seen direct evidence showing that I personally accessed another trader’s account. What concerns me even more is that Alpha’s own evidence showed different users connected to the same CID being classified as Safe, Warning, and Blacklisted, while my profile received the harshest outcome: all accounts terminated and payout denied. After this experience, I personally do not feel I can trust the firm’s compliance and payout process unless they provide a transparent technical review and clear evidence supporting such a severe decision. For me, the worst part is not simply the termination itself; it is losing confidence that a trader’s account and payout can be protected when a disputed technical identifier is involved. I believe Alpha should review the case properly, compare its records with the independent VPS evidence, and restore my accounts and payout if there is no direct proof that I personally committed the alleged violation.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
CID / Device ID match with other user accounts
Summary
Alpha denied my $3,180 payout and permanently closed all of my accounts over a disputed CID/device match with users I do not know and have never interacted with. I have never accessed or managed another trader’s account and have never shared my Alpha accounts or VPS with anyone. My VPS provider, ForexVPS, confirmed in writing that my VPS was never used by another customer and explained that some secondary/template-derived identifiers can remain identical across separately provisioned VPSs and could potentially contribute to a CID/device-ID match depending on Alpha’s detection method. Alpha’s own evidence also showed different profiles linked to the same CID being treated differently: one Safe, one Warning, while mine was Blacklisted. I am requesting a fair technical review, direct evidence beyond the CID, restoration of my accounts, and release of my $3,180 payout if no direct proof of account management exists.
Documents From Reporter
October 15th, 2026
Hi there, To reaffirm our stance on this matter as just, I will refer to both the context of the situation and the relevant legislation throughout the contract which is signed by all users, yourself included, upon the commencement of the business partnership between our respective parties. The first clause we will reference is a part of our General Service Agreement and of our Prohibited Trading Strategies policy, which applies to your accounts through condition 9.1.8 and which explicitly states: "Account management services are not allowed, and all accounts and trades must be performed by the trader whose name is on the account." This policy operates in tandem to Condition 7.1 of the Agreement which permits Alpha to terminate and/or suspend a User's access to the Services where a User fails, or Alpha suspects that a User has failed, to comply with any term or provision of the Terms. With the above policies in mind, I would like to give a final recount of the events that have transpired. On September 22nd, we identified and informed you of the access on your account from multiple devices which we believed were linked to multiple other users on our platform. This fact alone is sufficient to warrant the removal of services from your access; however, following your response a further investigation was conducted when it was discovered that your MT5 account had been accessed by 6 separate devices which had been linked to 14 other matched accounts for the same activity.Therefore, we can confidently conclude that your MT5 Account purchased with our firm, was accessed from another person based on the device links with other users. In this case, we have concluded that the above case facts have led to the suspicion that yourself as the user has failed to comply with all terms or provision of the terms by way of participating in account management activity, which has resulted in the action taken thus far. I would like to reiterate that the clauses that I have related to this particular case, were agreed upon at the beginning of the partnership, therefore, our enforcement of said policies is contractually justified.
NigeriaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
1 year +
6
5
The Honesty, as all their rules and conditions are outlined clearly
News slippage
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
NigeriaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
1 year +
4
0
What I like most about Alpha Capital is the quality of trade execution and competitive spreads, which are important for my trading style. I also really appreciate the regular discount offers, which make their accounts more accessible and provide good value for traders.
The strict risk-management rules can sometimes be challenging, especially when managing positions during periods of high market volatility. However, I understand that these rules are designed to protect both the trader and the firm, so overall I see them as an important part of responsible trading.
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
RomaniaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The price & condition
waiting time for live accounts.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
GhanaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
2
Trading conditions and support team
Payout processing
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
NigeriaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
N/A
0
I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.
I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Unfair breach based on fabricated claim
Summary
I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.
Documents From Reporter
CanadaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$200K
2 Steps
1 year +
10+
3
Way back in the past, once upon a time, they were good.
They are lying thieves.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Another account would have used the same IP once back in 2024
Summary
They imply this proves I hold multiple accounts or participate in group trading, which is false, and provide no proof at all. They only use this as an excuse to reject a payout and terminate my account.
Documents From Reporter
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
3 years +
3
1
Trading Condition are best, No slippage, Customer support, No hidden rules at all.
Payouts processing timelines seems very long, it should be improved .
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
0
Payout on demand with 40% consistency for swing accounts.
It would be great to directly get paid in crypto, I had to get crypto through rise which charged me some additional fees
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
PhilippinesReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
6 months +
8
3
CTRADER
PAYOUT DENIALS
5.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
ACCUSED FOR HITTING MAX LOT SIZE VIOLATION
Summary
My payout of 6.5k$ was rejected due to a violation of max lot size. To cut the story short, this account was accused under the 1% risk management group where the max lot size of a 50k funded account was 5 and I got trades that were executed of 7 lot sizes twice where hereto caused the reason for payout rejection and account closure. My concern is as I went deeper conversation with the payments team, I know that this account was lifted out of 1% group restrictions, I just accidentally deleted the confirmation email about it. They also found out that my account was lifted from the restriction on May 19th (which is I'm confidently right) and went back agagain on May 21st. How did it happen while I didn't have any executed trades during those days??? The only days where I executed trades for the whole month of May was on May 22nd (473$ loss) and May 26th (315$ loss)? Please see attached files below. How come they lifted the restrictions of this account and put it back again?
Documents From Reporter
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.