Buy
48141
country-flag

United Kingdom

CEO

Andrew Blaylock and George Kohler

Trustpilot

n/a

Date Created

Nov 2021

Years in Operation

4

4.4

1163

total reviews

5

809

4

209

3

37

2

11

1

97

Alpha Capital Group prop firm logo
Alpha Capital Group prop firm logo
Alpha Capital

4.4

1163

New Offer
45% OFF

45% off all accounts (except Alpha Pro 8% and 10% Bi-weekly)

OverviewChallenges
48
Reviews
1163
Offers
4
Payouts
New
Discussions
0

Alpha Capital Reviews

AI Summary
Good

Alpha Capital Reviews AI Summary

Traders consistently highlight Alpha Capital's reliable payout record, tight spreads, and clear trading rules as major strengths. Reviewers specifically praise the firm's execution speed on MT5, competitive spreads on gold and major pairs, and transparent conditions with "no hidden rules." Many note they've received multiple payouts over extended periods (some spanning 2-4 years), and the customer support—especially via Discord—receives frequent commendation for responsiveness and...

Reviews1163

Sort by

Reviewer profile
Ahmed
ETEthiopia

Reviews

Reviews

1.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$100K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
No
Certificates
August 28th, 2026

Title: $3,180 Payout Denied and All Accounts Terminated Over a Disputed CID Match This has been an extremely disappointing experience with Alpha Capital Group. After successfully progressing with the firm, completing and passing their Risk Interview, explaining my trading strategy, and previously receiving a payout, my next $3,180 payout was denied and all of my Alpha accounts were permanently terminated because of an alleged CID/device match with other traders. I strongly dispute this conclusion. I do not know the traders Alpha linked to me. I have never communicated with them, never accessed or managed their accounts, never shared my Alpha accounts with them, and never knowingly shared my VPS with another trader. Because the allegation was serious, I did not simply deny it. I contacted my VPS provider, ForexVPS, and requested a technical investigation. ForexVPS confirmed in writing that my VPS had never been used by another customer and was freshly provisioned. They also explained that while major machine identifiers are unique, some secondary/template-derived identifiers can remain identical across completely separate VPS instances. Their technical team confirmed that such identifiers could potentially contribute to a CID/device-ID match depending on what Alpha's system uses. ForexVPS has even offered to communicate directly with Alpha and confirm these findings. This creates an important technical question: Does Alpha's CID conclusively identify one uniquely controlled device, or can different VPS environments produce the same fingerprint depending on which machine identifiers are used? Another concerning point is Alpha's own evidence. Multiple profiles were associated with the same CID, but the classifications were different: One profile — Safe Another profile — Warning My profile — Blacklisted Yet my consequences were the most severe: $3,180 payout denied. All accounts permanently terminated. Profile blacklisted. I have asked Alpha to explain what additional evidence justifies treating the profiles differently. I have also requested the exact timestamps, source IP information, and any evidence independent of the CID itself proving that I personally accessed or controlled another trader's account. There is also an important timeline issue. The accounts Alpha referenced in the CID evidence were old challenge accounts from 2025, not the current accounts associated with my denied payout. I therefore want Alpha to explain how that historical device evidence justifies terminating all of my current accounts and denying my current payout. I am not asking Alpha to ignore its compliance or security systems. I am asking for a fair and complete technical investigation before a disputed device fingerprint is treated as unquestionable proof of account management. If Alpha has direct evidence that I personally managed another trader's account, they should provide it. If they cannot establish that, and the CID overlap can be explained by the technical characteristics of virtualized VPS environments, then I believe my accounts should be restored and my $3,180 payout should be released. I will update this review if Alpha properly investigates the technical evidence, provides convincing direct evidence, restores my accounts, or releases my payout. For traders considering Alpha: keep detailed records of your VPS, IP history, devices, emails and compliance communications. A CID/device dispute can apparently affect not only one account, but every account and an outstanding payout.

Funding Period

3 years +

Payout Count

0

Number of Firms Funded With

0

Top Firm Aspect

The only positive thing I can mention is that the company initially appeared professional. I passed their Risk Interview, my trading approach was reviewed, and I had previously received a payout. Unfortunately, that positive impression completely changed when my $3,180 payout was denied and all of my accounts were terminated over a disputed CID/device match. After what happened, especially considering the technical evidence I have provided from my VPS provider, it is extremely difficult for me to identify anything I genuinely like about how my case has been handled. What began as confidence in the firm has turned into serious disappointment and a complete loss of trust in their compliance and payout process.

Least Liked Aspect

What I liked the least was the way my case was handled after my $3,180 payout was denied and all of my accounts were permanently closed over a disputed CID/device match. I do not know the users Alpha linked to me, I never accessed or managed their accounts, and my VPS provider confirmed in writing that my VPS was never used by another customer. They also explained that some VPS template-derived identifiers can overlap across independently provisioned machines, which raises a genuine technical question about how Alpha’s CID is generated. Despite the seriousness of the consequences, I still have not seen direct evidence showing that I personally accessed another trader’s account. What concerns me even more is that Alpha’s own evidence showed different users connected to the same CID being classified as Safe, Warning, and Blacklisted, while my profile received the harshest outcome: all accounts terminated and payout denied. After this experience, I personally do not feel I can trust the firm’s compliance and payout process unless they provide a transparent technical review and clear evidence supporting such a severe decision. For me, the worst part is not simply the termination itself; it is losing confidence that a trader’s account and payout can be protected when a disputed technical identifier is involved. I believe Alpha should review the case properly, compare its records with the independent VPS evidence, and restore my accounts and payout if there is no direct proof that I personally committed the alleged violation.

1.0

User Friendliness

1.0

Payout Process

1.0

Customer Care

1.0

Trading Conditions

Report

Denied Amount

$3,180

Reason

Full Payout Denied

Denied Reason

CID / Device ID match with other user accounts

Summary

Alpha denied my $3,180 payout and permanently closed all of my accounts over a disputed CID/device match with users I do not know and have never interacted with. I have never accessed or managed another trader’s account and have never shared my Alpha accounts or VPS with anyone. My VPS provider, ForexVPS, confirmed in writing that my VPS was never used by another customer and explained that some secondary/template-derived identifiers can remain identical across separately provisioned VPSs and could potentially contribute to a CID/device-ID match depending on Alpha’s detection method. Alpha’s own evidence also showed different profiles linked to the same CID being treated differently: one Safe, one Warning, while mine was Blacklisted. I am requesting a fair technical review, direct evidence beyond the CID, restoration of my accounts, and release of my $3,180 payout if no direct proof of account management exists.

Documents From Reporter

Official Firm Reply

Verified Firm Profile

October 15th, 2026

Hi there,
 
To reaffirm our stance on this matter as just, I will refer to both the context of the situation and the relevant legislation throughout the contract which is signed by all users, yourself included, upon the commencement of the business partnership between our respective parties.
 
The first clause we will reference is a part of our General Service Agreement and of our Prohibited Trading Strategies policy, which applies to your accounts through condition 9.1.8 and which explicitly states:
 
"Account management services are not allowed, and all accounts and trades must be performed by the trader whose name is on the account."
 
This policy operates in tandem to Condition 7.1 of the Agreement which permits Alpha to terminate and/or suspend a User's access to the Services where a User fails, or Alpha suspects that a User has failed, to comply with any term or provision of the Terms.
 
With the above policies in mind, I would like to give a final recount of the events that have transpired.
 
On September 22nd, we identified and informed you of the access on your account from multiple devices which we believed were linked to multiple other users on our platform. This fact alone is sufficient to warrant the removal of services from your access; however, following your response a further investigation was conducted when it was discovered that your MT5 account had been accessed by 6 separate devices which had been linked to 14 other matched accounts for the same activity.Therefore, we can confidently conclude that your MT5 Account purchased with our firm, was accessed from another person based on the device links with other users.
 
In this case, we have concluded that the above case facts have led to the suspicion that yourself as the user has failed to comply with all terms or provision of the terms by way of participating in account management activity, which has resulted in the action taken thus far. I would like to reiterate that the clauses that I have related to this particular case, were agreed upon at the beginning of the partnership, therefore, our enforcement of said policies is contractually justified.
Reviewer profile
Idris
NGNigeria

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$10K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 26th, 2026

My experience with Alpha Capital Group has been very positive, especially when it comes to the trading conditions, customer service, and payout process. The trading conditions have been fair and suitable for my trading style. I appreciate the flexibility they provide, while the rules are clearly outlined, which makes it easier to understand what is expected from a trader. Their customer service has been another strong point for me. Whenever I have had questions or needed clarification regarding my account or the firm's rules, I have generally received helpful responses. This gives me confidence that there is a support team available when needed. Overall, it's a great firm as long as you follow the rules

Funding Period

1 year +

Payout Count

6

Number of Firms Funded With

5

Top Firm Aspect

The Honesty, as all their rules and conditions are outlined clearly

Least Liked Aspect

News slippage

5.0

User Friendliness

5.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

S
Solomon
NGNigeria

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$50K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 25th, 2026

My experience with Alpha Capital has been positive overall. The trading environment is good, the dashboard is easy to use, and the execution has been reliable for my trading style. What I particularly appreciate is the responsive customer support whenever I need clarification about account rules or trading conditions. Their risk-management requirements are strict, but I believe they encourage traders to become more disciplined and consistent. Overall, Alpha Capital has provided me with a professional trading environment and has helped me take risk management more seriously as a trader.

Funding Period

1 year +

Payout Count

4

Number of Firms Funded With

0

Top Firm Aspect

What I like most about Alpha Capital is the quality of trade execution and competitive spreads, which are important for my trading style. I also really appreciate the regular discount offers, which make their accounts more accessible and provide good value for traders.

Least Liked Aspect

The strict risk-management rules can sometimes be challenging, especially when managing positions during periods of high market volatility. However, I understand that these rules are designed to protect both the trader and the firm, so overall I see them as an important part of responsible trading.

5.0

User Friendliness

4.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

Reviewer profile
Rus
RORomania

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$50K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
No
Certificates
August 25th, 2026

I had a few payouts, the trading conditions are good, the support for traders is the same. I recommend it as a top choice for traders. If I were to start over, I would still choose them.

Funding Period

N/A

Payout Count

0

Number of Firms Funded With

Top Firm Aspect

The price & condition

Least Liked Aspect

waiting time for live accounts.

5.0

User Friendliness

5.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

Reviewer profile
Edward
GHGhana

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$10K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 25th, 2026

I Requested my first payout and received it without any issues. Special thanks to Raman Usman and Bazeet from the customer service team their support throughout the process was excellent. Rules are fair, process is transparent, and they actually pay. Highly recommend for any serious trader.

Funding Period

Less than 1 month

Payout Count

1

Number of Firms Funded With

2

Top Firm Aspect

Trading conditions and support team

Least Liked Aspect

Payout processing

5.0

User Friendliness

5.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

A
Alade
NGNigeria

Reviews

Reviews

1.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$5K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
No
Certificates
August 24th, 2026

I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.

Funding Period

N/A

Payout Count

0

Number of Firms Funded With

Top Firm Aspect

I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.

Least Liked Aspect

I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.

1.0

User Friendliness

1.0

Payout Process

1.0

Customer Care

1.0

Trading Conditions

Report

Reason

Unjustified Breach

Breach Reason

Unfair breach based on fabricated claim

Summary

I bought account with alpha capital with my hard earned money. I followed all their rules, and pass 2 phases When it's time for them to give me funded account, they fabricated claim that I did kyc from USA. I've never traveled outside Nigeria before, I've never installed VPN on my device. I did my whole trading and kyc in same room, same State, same Nigeria. There's several reputable prop firms out there, don't waste your money and time on shady prop firm like alpha capital so you don't learn the hard way.

Documents From Reporter

Reviewer profile
Alexandre
CACanada

Reviews

Reviews

1.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$200K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 24th, 2026

Alpha Capital Group Terminated My 2-Year 200k Funded Account to Avoid Paying a $5,000 Payout: After more than 2 years with Alpha Capital Group, during which I’ve maintained a single $200K funded account and received multiple payouts, I’m now being terminated over what I believe is an entirely baseless IP violation. Over the past 3 months, getting payouts has become increasingly difficult, with repeated excuses, rejections, delays, and non-answers. This time, I was told: “During our routine compliance monitoring, we detected that your account has been accessed from the same IP address by a different account. This constitutes a direct violation of our IP rule policy.” I have only ever had one Alpha Capital account, have never traded another account with them, and trade entirely by myself. The only “evidence” they provided was a screenshot showing some Outlook email activity associated with an IP address that I may have logged into once sometime in 2024. No meaningful documentation, no identification of the supposed other account, and no explanation of how this supposedly proves that I traded another account. I was waiting on a $5,000 payout that had already been delayed for over a month. After more than two years as a consistently profitable client, this is how they chose to handle it. At this point, I have serious concerns that Alpha Capital is simply looking for reasons to deny legitimate payouts. The excuses and scrutiny have escalated to the point where even long-term profitable traders with a single account are having their payouts rejected. If you're a new trader or you're currently trying to pass one of their challenges, you may not see this side of the company yet. Passing a challenge is one thing. Actually getting paid consistently is another. My experience over the past few months has completely changed my view of Alpha Capital Group. They are going downhill fast. Be extremely careful with them.

Funding Period

1 year +

Payout Count

10+

Number of Firms Funded With

3

Top Firm Aspect

Way back in the past, once upon a time, they were good.

Least Liked Aspect

They are lying thieves.

1.0

User Friendliness

1.0

Payout Process

1.0

Customer Care

1.0

Trading Conditions

Report

Denied Amount

$5,000

Reason

Full Payout Denied

Denied Reason

Another account would have used the same IP once back in 2024

Summary

They imply this proves I hold multiple accounts or participate in group trading, which is false, and provide no proof at all. They only use this as an excuse to reject a payout and terminate my account.

Documents From Reporter

Reviewer profile
Naveed
PKPakistan

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$100K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 23rd, 2026

I have been trading with Alpha Capital Group since 2024, and my experience with them was great overall. In total I have received over $50,000 in payouts with ACG, and I have never faced an unfair denial. And recently, I requested a payout of 2,035$ which was processed smoothly and within predefined timelines without any issues. The trading conditions and overall system are completely traders friendly. A special Thanks to their customer support team, particularly Sir RAMI (Discord Mod), who was supportive and helpful, he kept me updated throughout the process, and everything went seamlessly as he guided me. If you are looking for a reliable, supportive, and professional prop firm, Alpha Capital Group is best choice. Long live ACG.

Funding Period

3 years +

Payout Count

3

Number of Firms Funded With

1

Top Firm Aspect

Trading Condition are best, No slippage, Customer support, No hidden rules at all.

Least Liked Aspect

Payouts processing timelines seems very long, it should be improved .

5.0

User Friendliness

5.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

Reviewer profile
Tyro
INIndia

Reviews

Reviews

5.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$10K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 22nd, 2026

It was a great experience trading with this firm, I had purchased 10k swing account with them, passed my eval phase 1 &2. Payout on demand rockzz ... what a rule....40% consistency which is easily achievable....Jst took a week to pass all criteria and got paid $407. Great experience overall. Now going to try their Futures program too (Advanced model) great rules and largest drawdown options. Hope prop firm match brings back them on their site.

Funding Period

Less than 1 month

Payout Count

1

Number of Firms Funded With

0

Top Firm Aspect

Payout on demand with 40% consistency for swing accounts.

Least Liked Aspect

It would be great to directly get paid in crypto, I had to get crypto through rise which charged me some additional fees

5.0

User Friendliness

5.0

Payout Process

5.0

Customer Care

5.0

Trading Conditions

Reviewer profile
Lance
PHPhilippines

Reviews

Reviews

1.0

Trader’s Satisfaction

Account Size

$50K

Program

2 Steps

Reached Payout
Yes
Certificates
August 22nd, 2026

My payout of 6.5k$ was rejected due to a violation of max lot size. To cut the story short, this account was accused under the 1% risk management group where the max lot size of a 50k funded account was 5 and I got trades that were executed of 7 lot sizes twice where hereto caused the reason for payout rejection and account closure. My concern is as I have went with deeper conversation with the payments team, I know that this account was lifted out of 1% group restrictions, I just accidentally deleted the confirmation email about it. As they checked, they told me that I was notified on May 21st that my account was back again at 1% risk group parameters. Which I didn't received an email because if I received it, I would likely be open for another conversation. But let's just say that they really emailed me about this matter, the other one crucial concern is this: They also found out that my account was lifted from the restriction on May 19th (which is I'm confidently right) and went back again on May 21st. How did it happen while I didn't have any executed trades during those days??? The only days where I executed trades for the whole month of May was on May 22nd (473$ loss) and May 26th (315$ loss)? Please see attached files below. How come they lifted the restrictions of this account and put it back again on the days where I didn't execute any trades without any proper reason? Look sir, I've been in a risk management group for a very long whole time since December 2025 and I really know how it works. I know that I am confident that my account was lifted of this restriction, giving me confidence to put lot sizes above my usual lot sizes (maximum of 5). You can see it on any of my executed trades. These lapses are the reason for my denied payout.

Funding Period

6 months +

Payout Count

8

Number of Firms Funded With

3

Top Firm Aspect

CTRADER

Least Liked Aspect

PAYOUT DENIALS

5.0

User Friendliness

1.0

Payout Process

1.0

Customer Care

4.0

Trading Conditions

Report

Denied Amount

$6,500

Reason

Full Payout Denied

Denied Reason

ACCUSED FOR HITTING MAX LOT SIZE VIOLATION

Summary

My payout of 6.5k$ was rejected due to a violation of max lot size. To cut the story short, this account was accused under the 1% risk management group where the max lot size of a 50k funded account was 5 and I got trades that were executed of 7 lot sizes twice where hereto caused the reason for payout rejection and account closure. My concern is as I went deeper conversation with the payments team, I know that this account was lifted out of 1% group restrictions, I just accidentally deleted the confirmation email about it. They also found out that my account was lifted from the restriction on May 19th (which is I'm confidently right) and went back agagain on May 21st. How did it happen while I didn't have any executed trades during those days??? The only days where I executed trades for the whole month of May was on May 22nd (473$ loss) and May 26th (315$ loss)? Please see attached files below. How come they lifted the restrictions of this account and put it back again?

Documents From Reporter

Stay Connected

Subscribe For The Latest In Prop Trading News And Deals

200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.

Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.

Create Free Account
Prop Firm Business

Have Questions?

Contact Us for More.

Contact Us
twitter-logoinstagram-logoyoutube-logotiktok-logolinkedin-logo

© 2026 Prop Firm Match. All rights reserved.

    Alpha Capital Reviews: 4.4★ from 1,163 Verified Traders | Page 17 | Prop Firm Match