CEO
Country

Hong Kong
Trustpilot
n/a
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
n/a
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.0
1228
total reviews
5
704
4
265
3
38
2
34
1
187
4.0
1228
4.0
1228
45% off all accounts + free account upon reaching payout (directly issued by the firm, except the 5K 2‑Step GOAT & Standard accounts)
4.0
1228
45% off all accounts + free account upon reaching payout (directly issued by the firm, except the 5K 2‑Step GOAT & Standard accounts)
Recurring complaints dominate this sample, centering on payout denials following accusations of copy trading, coordinated trading, VPS usage, or IP-related violations. Traders report passing challenges and reaching funded status, only to have payouts rejected—often ranging from hundreds to several thousand dollars—accompanied by generic explanations, lack of concrete evidence, and unresponsive risk teams. Multiple reviewers describe being blocked from support channels or receiving automated...
Reviews1228
Sort by
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
3 years +
1
4
They don't rejected your withdrawal if you follow the rules
I like every thing
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
Netherlands, Kingdom of theReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
1 Step
N/A
0
I like the dashboard it is verry organized and the price is also ok
They find reason for not paying out. I don't like the consistency rule. And for pay out you need to be onder 20% every single time for me this doesn't make sense
5.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Copytrading
Summary
"I have executed a total of 157 manual trades on this account, and their automated system flagged only 29 trades for alleged copy-trading. This means that nearly 82% of all my trading activity was proven to be 100% unique, organic, and executed professionally by me alone. It makes absolutely no sense that I would independently trade 82% of the account with strict risk management, only to use 'help' or coordinate for the remaining trades. This is a clear automated false positive."
Documents From Reporter
IndiaReviews
2.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
Instant
1 month +
0
1
ONLY THEIR DASHBOARD WITH BEAUTIFUL FRONT END DEVELOPER
Their support team until they recive money
3.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
2.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
They tell its copy trading
Summary
GFT’s automated compliance scripts flag accounts based on pure database correlation [INDEX]. To their server monitoring software, your account patterns look like latency arbitrage or an automated copier script: • Identical Timestamps: On September 21, 22, and 28, blocks of 5 trades closed at the exact same second inside a single minute block. • Group Syncing: GFT’s database showed that separate accounts (like 315****32 and 315****56) closed identical XAUUSD positions at those exact same seconds. • Shared Network: Your login authorizations mapped back to the same public network pool shared by dozens of other accounts. 1. The Native MT5 "Bulk Operations" Button Proof 2.The Indian Mobile 4G CGNAT Network Reality 3.Chronological Timestamp Inversions 4. Total Lot Size Discrepancy i can explain all log details but my wordings are limited here
Documents From Reporter
KenyaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
N/A
0
What I like most about GFT is the flexibility they offer traders. The range of account options, competitive trading conditions, and opportunity to earn funded capital make it an attractive choice for traders who prioritize freedom and proper risk management.
What I like least about GFT is that some of the rules and conditions can take time to fully understand, especially for newer traders. Clearer communication and simpler explanations of certain rules would make the overall experience even better.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
IndiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$2.5K
Instant
N/A
0
Nothing
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
1% floating loss
Summary
Recently i purchased a funded stride account on the main page their was no rule about floating loss or anything even on theiir faq their is no rule for goat funded stride accounts so i asked the support about the rules and they send me instant funding goat model rules i read and saw their was 2% floating loss which is 50$ in my case , but today morning i saw my account was breached for 1% floating loss and i asked their ssupport and they told the floating loss was 1% for instant so i told them your support made mistake that's why i set my sl at 30$ so reset my account cause the incovience caused is by your end , they keep on making dumb replies neithier neglicting or accepting their mistakess
Documents From Reporter
October 7th, 2026
Hello Shivam, Thank you for your feedback. We understand your concerns regarding the Stride account and Floating Loss limit. As stated in our FAQ, Goat Stride follows the Instant HERO rules, which include a 1% Floating Loss limit. The account was therefore breached based on the applicable Stride conditions and recorded account data. We encourage traders to review the rules applicable to their specific account model before trading.
Reviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$150K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Nothing. Good conditions mean nothing when legitimate payouts are denied over automated system errors and accounts get blocked.
False automated breaches, zero manual review of trade evidence, and completely blocking account access to deny payouts on accounts
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Coordinated trading
Summary
False "Coordinated Trading" breach on account #314940913. I trade standard lots risking $500/trade, but their automated system flagged me against accounts risking $10 taking 0.01 micro-lots. Support refuses to conduct a manual audit of the trade logs or lot sizes and completely blocked my account access.
Documents From Reporter
October 7th, 2026
Hello Frh, Thank you for your detailed feedback regarding account #314940913. We understand your concerns regarding the rejected payout and coordinated trading finding. The assessment is not based on lot size or trade value alone. Our Risk Team reviews multiple account and trading-data factors when assessing coordinated activity, and the decision was made based on the applicable rules and available data. The relevant findings were communicated through the established channel. If you dispute the decision, please reply to the Risk Team’s email with any additional evidence so it can be considered through the established review process.
ItalyReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
1 Step
6 months +
3
6
nothing
payout
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
MT5
Summary
GOAT Funded Trader rejected my $3,226 payout after a Risk Team interview. They claimed I used a VPS to conceal my IP, but I explained that I used it to keep the same IP across different devices and networks. They also claimed I could not show MT5 during the interview, which I dispute because I opened MT5 when requested. I asked them to review the interview recording and provide the specific rule I allegedly violated. My detailed appeal remains unanswered.
Documents From Reporter
October 7th, 2026
Hello Raffaella, Thank you for sharing your detailed feedback regarding the rejected payout and account breach. We understand your concerns, but the account decision was not based solely on the explanation provided during the interview or on the trader’s stated intention for using a VPS. The Risk Team’s assessment considered the applicable rules together with the available account, trading, and technical data, and the relevant findings were communicated through the established channel. The fact that a trader considers their VPS usage to be intended for stability or consistency does not by itself make the activity compliant with the applicable requirements. We also cannot disclose confidential review methods, internal records, or technical information used in our risk assessment. If you dispute the findings, you may submit any additional evidence through the existing Risk Team email for consideration under the established appeal process.
Reviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
0
1
> ⭐ 1/5 – Very disappointing experience I received a violation for allegedly exceeding the 80% margin usage limit. However, I was only trading one XAUUSD.x position at a time, with a size of 0.20 lot, and I never had multiple positions open simultaneously. Based on my own calculation, the margin usage was approximately 17%, so I do not understand how it could have exceeded 80%. I tried to contact Support to request an explanation and a review of my account, but I have not received any response or clarification. I believe the company should provide the exact timestamps, leverage applied, margin calculation, and account data used to determine that I exceeded the 80% limit. Overall, this has been a very disappointing experience, especially because I have not received a proper response from Support.
> ⭐ 1/5 – Very disappointing experience I received a violation for allegedly exceeding the 80% margin usage limit. However, I was only trading one XAUUSD.x position at a time, with a size of 0.20 lot, and I never had multiple positions open simultaneously. Based on my own calculation, the margin usage was approximately 17%, so I do not understand how it could have exceeded 80%. I tried to contact Support to request an explanation and a review of my account, but I have not received any response or clarification. I believe the company should provide the exact timestamps, leverage applied, margin calculation, and account data used to determine that I exceeded the 80% limit. Overall, this has been a very disappointing experience, especially because I have not received a proper response from Support.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
October 7th, 2026
Hello Anas, Thank you for your detailed feedback. We understand your concerns regarding the 80% margin usage violation. Margin usage is determined based on the applicable account conditions and the recorded account data at the relevant time, including the margin required for the position and available equity. Therefore, the number of positions or lot size alone does not determine whether the limit was exceeded. The account was reviewed based on the applicable rules and recorded trading data. If you dispute the finding, please reply to the relevant Support or Risk Team communication so the specific account records can be reviewed and clarified.
EthiopiaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Honestly, after my experience, there is very little I can say I liked most about this firm. I trusted Goat Funded Trader, completed the process, reached the funded stage, and earned a payout. However, when it was time for my payout, my account was closed based on an allegation I strongly deny. The most disappointing part was not only losing the account and payout, but being denied clear evidence to support the accusation. A firm can have an attractive website, rules, and support messages, but trust is built when a trader is treated fairly at the moment it matters most. In my case, I did not feel that happened.
What I liked least was the lack of transparency. My account was closed and my $1,765.16 payout was denied for alleged device sharing, which I strongly deny. Despite asking for login dates, IP addresses, and device evidence, I received only general system statements. I expected a fair review and clear proof before losing my account and payout.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Alleged device-sharing violation — strongly disputed; no verifiable evidence provided after one mont
Summary
Goat Funded Trader denied my payout of $1,765.16 and breached my funded account, alleging that the same device accessed accounts belonging to different people. I strongly deny this allegation. I never shared my device, VPS, MT5 credentials, or account with anyone. I provided proof that my VPS was rented solely in my name, but the firm maintained its decision and refused to provide the login dates, IP addresses, device information, or access records needed to verify the claim. The account was not reactivated, and the payout was not processed.
Documents From Reporter
October 7th, 2026
Hello Nasradin, Thank you for sharing your feedback. We understand your concerns regarding the rejected payout and device-sharing finding. However, account actions are not based on an unexplained system flag or allegation. The account was reviewed based on the applicable Terms and Conditions and available account and technical data, and the relevant findings were communicated through the established Risk Team channel. For security and privacy reasons, we cannot disclose confidential detection methods or information relating to other accounts. If you dispute the findings, you may reply directly to the Risk Team’s email with any additional evidence for consideration through the established process.
Reviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
Instant
N/A
0
Initially, trading conditions were good - low spreads on Gold, fast execution on MT5 and instant account activation was quick. Dashboard is also clean and easy to use. But the good experience stopped at payout phase.
What I liked least is the payout denial process. My $2500 payout on my 100k Instant account (Order #6298203) was denied for alleged copy trading. They provided zero evidence - no matched account numbers, no trade IDs, no timestamps. I trade manually from Fez, Morocco, no EA, no group. Support just sends generic replies and refuses a transparent manual review by a senior risk manager. This is very unfair after paying $419 and making real profit.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Copy Trading
Summary
On Sept 27th 2026, my payout request for $2500 on my 100k Instant account Order #6298203 was denied. Reason given: copy trading. I trade manually only from Fez, Morocco, no EA, no signals, no group trading. I asked for proof - matched accounts, trade IDs, timestamps - but they refused to provide any evidence. They only send generic replies. I requested a senior risk manager review. Account email matches order confirmation. I am ready to provide screen recording and trading journal.
Documents From Reporter
October 7th, 2026
Hello Achraf, Thank you for your feedback regarding account #314873019. We understand your concerns regarding the rejected payout and copy trading finding. Please note that the account was closed on April 20, 2026, and the relevant findings and outcome were communicated at the time. The case has already been reviewed based on the applicable rules and available account and trading data, and the information relevant to the decision has been provided through the established channel.
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.