3.7
751
total reviews
5
363
4
156
3
36
2
20
1
176
Reviews751
Sort by
3.7
ZAReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
Although its been a while I thought I would just leave this one here since thye kinda deserve it, My experience with QT has been good eben though it didnt turn out to be fruitful for me I can still say the experience was worth it, Their QT Power account really taught me a lot about the discpline and patiance of just focusing on base hits as opposed to chasing masive RR's so I have that to thank them for, I treat my accounts wayy more seriously now and Focus more on taking control of the risk and letting the market handle the rest. Overall a good exp...
N/A
0
The trading spreads and conditions were very very good, one of the reasons why I was soo clean on my entries but honestly they really have great spreads.
Making sure that your users get the best dashboard experience to me has to be the very first thing a prop firm focuses on, then the rest shall follow, so even though its not terrible, it isnt what you expect from a firm like this...
3.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
GBReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I’ve received multiple payouts from QT, execution and rule adherence on my side have been key, and each payout has been honored after review. Overall, a solid option for traders who understand the rules, and stay consistent.
6 Months +
4
4
Competitive pricing and good trading conditions
N/A
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
INReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
For the past two years, I’ve had an exceptional journey trading with Quant tekel prop firm. Their framework is clear and fair—whenever I adhered to their rules, I always received my payouts reliably and on time. It’s a testament to their integrity: you can trust this firm—follow the rules, get paid. Beyond that, their customer support is impressive; I’ve always received fast, helpful responses whenever I needed assistance. The combination of professionalism, dependable payouts, and solid support has made this a highly rewarding and stress-free exper...
N/A
0
follow rule get paid
processing time
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
ZAReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Smooth trading platform. Clear rules, just follow the rules and get paid. Affordable different types of challenges available. Very tight spreads on us30
N/A
0
Spreads on us30, clear rules. Fast execution. Nice dashboard
Consistency score. It will be a good thing if they can remove it on Power Challenge & Funded
5.0
User Friendliness
2.0
Payout Process
3.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
GBReviews
3.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
Customer service really good and the trading experience itself was good, however, took around 30 days to have a payout approved and then another 10 days from that to get paid out.
1 Month +
1
4
Customer Service
Payout time
4.0
User Friendliness
2.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
INReviews
2.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
I purchased two step power account which have 35% consistency rule ,3% exposure rule in single trade ...i started 3 week ago ,i am bit aggressive trader but never took more than 2% in any trade in first phase i made 900$ in single day which makes 2600$ my first phase target bcoz of 35% consistency rule which i completed successfully and got second phase detail and in four days and keep 35% consistency in my mind never cross 210$ in single day and made 610$ on fourth day , passed both phases...then started their risk review process which took more ...
Less 1 Month
0
4
Only prices bcoz Recommended by friend
breach of wrong risk exposure
2.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
3.0
Customer Care
2.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
Risk exposure breach
Summary
Thier risk exposure is 3% and i took 2% maximum in any trade still they refuse me to give funded account after passing both phases
Documents From Reporter
3.7
NGReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
QT Funded is a decent option for traders who are confident in their strategy and looking to scale, but success ultimately depends on discipline and execution rather than the firm itself.
1 Month +
1
2
On time payout processing
Wide spread
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
INReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
QT funded is good firm for profitable trader. they have good support , good spread , good trading condition and good payout policies. they paid me in less than 2 hours.
3 Months +
0
5
payout
The process takes a bit longer after the interview, which needs improvement. Otherwise, everything is good in the firm.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
3.7
TRReviews
2.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
Instant
It says fast payment, but it's definitely a lie, they pay after 1 month. They keep postponing and don't answer. It constantly says wait 24 hours and the result is nothing. As proof, they are constantly postponing the last payout I got in the photos, I think they won't give it. I get Payout, no payment was made on time. They gave the payment in 20 days at the earliest.
N/A
0
.
I don't recommend it, there is absolutely no communication
5.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
2.0
Trading Conditions
Denied Amount
Reason
Denied Reason
Dont
Summary
Payout talebi sonuçlanmıyor .
Documents From Reporter
3.7
INReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
I successfully passed both Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the evaluation without violating any clearly defined rules such as daily or maximum drawdown. At no point during the process was I warned or informed that my trading behavior was inappropriate. However, after completing both phases, my account was disqualified based on “Excessive Exposure,” claiming I exceeded around 3% risk. The issue is that during the evaluation, there was no clearly defined risk limit—only an advisory to follow “prudent risk management.” This creates a major transparency proble...
1 Month +
0
2
Initially, the firm offered good live chat support and quick responses, which made communication easy and helpful during the evaluation process.
Support quality declined over time, with delayed or no responses. The live chat option was removed, and I was banned from Discord after raising concerns. Additionally, unclear and inconsistently applied rules led to an unfair disqualification.
4.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
After successfully passing both Phase 1 and Phase 2 without violating any clearly defined rules, my account was disqualified during the final review. The firm stated that I breached their “Excessive Exposure” policy by exposing slightly above 3% of my account. However, during the evaluation, there was no clearly defined or fixed risk limit—only an advisory to follow “prudent risk management.” No warnings or restrictions were given at any stage, and the issue was only raised after completion, making the decision unclear and unfair.
Summary
The rules explicitly mention that there is no set risk restriction during the evaluation phase, yet my account was later judged based on an implied exposure limit (~2.5–3%). This creates a contradiction between stated rules and enforcement. If such limits exist, they should be clearly defined and enforced in real time. Additionally, when I tried to seek clarification, I received no proper response and was banned from Discord, which reflects poor transparency and support.
Documents From Reporter