Audacity Capital Reviews

Although it takes almost a week to get your payout approved, they finally pay you if you have followed their rules. Trading conditions are so good, especially for Indices. Dashboard is better than their previous one but can be improved a lot. Customer support team is fast to reply via emails - Within 24 hours.

I’ll start from the beginning. I bought a 240k 2 phase account & I passed it. I got funded and I received about 3 payouts, At first I believed it was a trustworthy prop firm since I read some reviews here and since they paid me out. Then out of the blue, risk team contacted me and told me I’m restricted to 1% daily max loss. What this means is if you lose 1% on the day, your account is terminated. No soft breach , no warning, just breached and decision is “final” , I never risked more than 2% on the day. One day I lost 40 dollars over 1% on the day and I got my account terminated immediately, They advertise 5% max daily loss or 10% max over all loss. The 240k account costed me 800$ USD with a discount and they said they would refund the fee after first payout. They lied about that. I have received over 220k in payouts with other firm so I know how to maintain a low risk plan

The trading conditions rules and spreads are genuinely of best instituitional Level. The dashboard is also great. The thing to improve is support and payout Timelines. 3-5 days to get a payout is alot. It should be 48 hours done. The support is active but no fast. Average reply time 3-4 hours. Only on mail and whatsapp. Overall great firm. Never Rejects the payout. Recieved 2 more Payouts. Absolute beasts.

I traded live account #200931 entirely within the system-enforced parameters on the MT5 server, achieving a profit of $10,428.60 and ranking #1 on their leaderboard. My payout was completely denied. Prospective traders need to know how this firm operates behind the scenes: The 3% Rule: They will breach your account for risking over 3% on a single trade, even though this rule does not exist anywhere on PropFirmMatch or their official Prohibited Trading Practices page. In their email to me, they admitted it is a hidden "internal risk parameter." Exact words - "The account currently under review (#200931) shows one trade above the 3% threshold out of 58, peaking at 3.02% - broadly in line with the more moderate risk profile seen on the client's other passed and live accounts, though still part of the same overall pattern of occasional oversized risk-taking." Changing the English Language: Their terms state scalping is a breach if it is "most or all" trades. When I proved only 5% of my trades were short-duration executions (3 trades out of 58), their compliance team told me in writing that "most or all" is just a suggestion and they can ban you for a single isolated trade anyway. Mentioned that I have a trade that was flagged because it was closed within 3 seconds. I explained it was a misclick and closed it immediately, but they denied my payout. No Clean Slate: If you fail challenges in the past and pay them for retakes, they will dig up those dead demo accounts to claim you have a "high-risk profile" to forfeit your live profits. Direct quote - "A net-negative combined result of -$17,222.22 across all twelve accounts, substantially exceeding the positive result on the account currently under review." This places me to be a high risk and outright banned my account withholding my supposed payout. If they don't like a trader's risk profile, a legitimate firm pays out the earned debt and parts ways. Audacity Capital chooses to deactivate your account, lock you out of your data, and pocket your five-figure balance. Trade elsewhere.

Very good firm. Received 2 rewards with no problems. Tight spreads and fair conditions. Good support. Swift payments, great atmosphere. Highly recommended 😊

The total amount of payments currently stands at $18,000. Payments are processed and confirmed within 1-3 business days, which I consider quite fast. There are also clear rules—if followed, there will be no questions from the proprietorship firm. Special thanks to rolando@audacitycapital.co.uk

"Audacity Capital is easily one of the best prop firms out there. The onboarding process was super quick, and I got my funded account in no time. The trading conditions are excellent, and the support team is always active and helpful. Huge thanks to Rolando from support, who handled my payout process smoothly and made the whole experience completely seamless!

After some disappointing experiences with other prop firms, I was naturally cautious. However, Audacity Capital has completely changed my perspective. The onboarding process was smooth, and their support team has been responsive, professional, and genuinely trader-friendly whenever I’ve needed assistance. I’m currently trading a $120k funded account, and receiving my first payout was a seamless experience processed without any unnecessary delays or complications, which gave me even more confidence in the firm. One suggestion I’d love to see is a dedicated swing trading account with swap-free or long-hold-friendly conditions for traders who hold positions over multiple days. It would also be great to expand the available markets by adding assets like Platinum and more soft commodities, providing greater diversification opportunities. Overall, my experience with Audacity Capital has been excellent. It’s a transparent, reliable, and supportive prop firm that has restored my confidence, and I look forward to continuing my journey with them.

I passed the "Ability Challenge" and requested my first payout—my profit of $235. Following the request, Audacity Capital rejected the payment, flagged my account for violating the rules, and stated that the decision was final. They cited two reasons: 1. Trading during news events ("news trading") 2. DCA / Dollar-Cost Averaging Regarding news trading, their public rules indicate that trading during news events or holding positions over the weekend is "permitted." The wording states that traders should avoid opening, closing, or adding to positions within the 3 minutes before or after high-impact news releases, as this could be identified as excessive risk. In my case, the trade was not opened to capitalize on the news event. The position had been opened and managed many hours prior to the news release, with TP/SL (Take Profit/Stop Loss) levels set more than 11 hours in advance. I followed the same risk management process used in all my other trades throughout the account's history; only this position—managed 11 hours prior—coincided with a news event, proving that I avoided news trading by literally following the rules written on the company's website. As for the DCA point, the company's stance is even more unreasonable. My XAUUSD entries consisted of fixed lots—0.02, 0.03, or 0.01—across *only* two entries; they were obviously not based on Martingale or an aggressive loss-recovery system. They were small, planned entries involving gradual position scaling (*scale-in*) within a specific technical price zone. As mentioned, the XAUUSD lot sizes were very small. I did not use aggressive position scaling, nor did I risk the account on an "all-or-nothing" strategy. I requested a more detailed review based on the policies, including the exact trade IDs, the specific rule clauses applied, and a clarification on whether the automatic execution of TP/SL orders—set many hours before the news event—is treated the same way as a manual close during the news. They replied that the decision would stand. My concern is not just the payment rejection itself, but how the rules were interpreted. A trade managed many hours before the news was treated as a news-related violation, and two small 0.01-lot entries were treated as DCA. Traders need to be very careful regarding the interpretation of Audacity's rules. The rules should be clear; the news rule is listed as "News Trading / Weekend Holding: Allowed," and the rule itself advises avoiding opening, closing, or adding to positions within a 3-minute window—actions I adhered to as a trader. Regarding DCA, the rule's application is even more absurd; there was no continuous, progressive sequence of increasing lot sizes. There were small, planned 0.01-lot entries placed at technical levels. If their rule prohibits placing a second order on the same asset/direction while the first is in the red, that should be stated objectively; that is neither DCA nor progressive scaling—it is simply a restriction against opening more than one order on the same asset.

I've been trading with Audacity since 6 April 2026, and my experience has been excellent so far. I was fortunate enough to pass the evaluation and become funded. From the evaluation stage all the way to receiving my funded account, the entire process was smooth and straightforward—no unnecessary drama, no hidden issues, and no unexpected complications. I've now received 4 payouts, and every payout was processed without any problems. I wasn't subjected to unnecessary interviews, false accusations, or other obstacles that I've unfortunately experienced with some other prop firms. As a genuine trader, it's refreshing to work with a company that simply honors its terms when you trade within the rules. Based on my experience so far, I'm very happy to continue trading with Audacity. If everything continues to run as smoothly as it has, I'll definitely consider purchasing another evaluation account in the future. Of course, I'll continue to judge them over the long term, but as of today, my experience has been entirely positive. Hopefully, things continue this way with no unexpected surprises.