CEO
Country

Dubai (UAE)
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
CEO
Trustpilot
Date Created
Years in Operation
4.3
909
total reviews
5
585
4
205
3
33
2
11
1
75
4.3
909
4.3
909
7% off on all accounts (new user only)
4.3
909
7% off on all accounts (new user only)
FundedNext receives consistent praise for fast payouts, with multiple traders reporting same-day or sub-24-hour processing and transparent payout procedures. Traders appreciate clear trading rules, flexibility in trading conditions including news trading and weekend holding, and helpful customer support that responds quickly to issues. The platform's user-friendly dashboard, straightforward challenge structure (particularly the Stellar 2-Step with static drawdown), and competitive spreads on...
Reviews909
Sort by
4.3
IndiaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$6K
1 Step
N/A
0
The 50k futures account and customer service
The price of cfd 1 step is little bit higher
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
ArmeniaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$25K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Dashboard
There isn't any, as I haven't reached the funding stage yet.
5.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
SwitzerlandReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
What I liked the most was the fairness. The rules are clear and transparent, and if you trade properly, you know exactly where you stand. I also appreciated that the payout and challenge fee refund were handled exactly as promised. That gave me a lot of trust in the firm.
Its in the middle to upper cost class firm
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
NigeriaReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$15K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
24 hour payout
24 hours payout
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
FundedNext Grid-Trading Breach: Incomplete Evidence, Unanswered Discrepancies, and Lack of Transparency
Summary
I would like to explain my experience with FundedNext and the issues surrounding an alleged grid-trading breach on my $15,000 Stellar 2 account. I successfully passed both Phase 1 and Phase 2 and obtained my funded account. However, FundedNext subsequently terminated the account over an alleged grid-trading violation relating to my trading activity on September 7, 2026. 1. The alleged breach and incomplete evidence FundedNext provided a report identifying only 10 trades, despite my actual MT5 trading history containing 16 trades for that day. Their explanation referred to certain buy positions having identical stop-loss levels and treated the trading pattern as evidence of grid trading. I challenged this determination because the report did not account for all 16 trades in their actual MT5 execution order. I also raised specific discrepancies concerning the trades selected for the report, the treatment of trades occurring at different times, and the reported grid-profit calculation of $107.60. My MT5 statement showed a net loss of approximately $375.46 for the day. I was not asking FundedNext to ignore its rules. I was asking the company to demonstrate precisely how my actual trading activity violated those rules. 2. The issue with the evidence they provided The most concerning part is that FundedNext indicated that the previous evidence or report was intended to demonstrate the reliability of its determination. However, that report itself contained discrepancies that I repeatedly identified and requested them to address. Rather than resolving those specific discrepancies, providing a complete trade-by-trade analysis, and showing how all 16 trades supported the allegation, the company continued to rely on its determination without giving me the complete underlying evidence I had requested. I repeatedly asked for the actual evidence in the correct MT5 execution order so I could independently understand the alleged grid pattern, examine the transactions being grouped together, and respond meaningfully to the accusation. My concern is that a report presented to demonstrate the reliability of a decision cannot adequately resolve a dispute when the trader has identified specific inconsistencies that remain unanswered. Repeating that the evidence has been reviewed is not the same as addressing those inconsistencies. 3. Refusal to address my specific questions Despite repeatedly explaining the discrepancies and requesting clarification, I did not receive satisfactory answers to the specific issues I raised. FundedNext eventually informed me that its decision was final and non-negotiable. This left me without a satisfactory explanation of how the company reconciled its report with the complete MT5 history or why the discrepancies I identified did not affect its conclusion. I believe traders should have a meaningful opportunity to understand and challenge a serious breach allegation, particularly when the decision results in the termination of a funded account. 4. What I would like to understand about your firm I would appreciate your honest assessment of this situation and clarification of the following: * Does your firm provide traders with the complete underlying evidence supporting an alleged breach when a trader formally disputes the findings? * If a trader identifies specific discrepancies in a compliance report, does your firm investigate and respond to those points individually? * Is it standard practice to rely on a previous report described as demonstrating the reliability of a determination without addressing the specific discrepancies raised by the affected trader? * What appeal process is available if the evidence provided does not sufficiently explain the alleged violation? My concern is not simply that FundedNext terminated my account. It is that I repeatedly requested the actual, complete evidence necessary to understand and challenge the allegation, identified specific discrepancies in the report they provided, and still did not receive satisfactory answers before the decision was declared final. I believe compliance rules should be enforced fairly and consistently, but transparency and accountability are equally important. A trader should not be expected to accept a serious allegation without a clear explanation of the evidence supporting it, particularly when the trader has raised concrete questions that remain unanswered. I am sharing this experience because I want to understand whether this approach to breach investigations and appeals is standard across the prop-firm industry, or whether your firm follows a more transparent process. I attached my complete mt5 history in chronological order and fundednext isolated or selective arrange Evidance to form a violation
Documents From Reporter
4.3
IndiaReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
(payout speed) first i was bit scared not gonna lie due to people discussing stuff around but there was no issue in payout in my case and payout speed great.
it's not bad compared to some top firms(even they have bad spread on gold and fundednext have bit better) still spread improvement can be done to if they want compete to top spot.
4.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
United KingdomReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
N/A
0
The helpful staff and easy to use platform
N/A
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
United StatesReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
N/A
0
Horrible experience
Customer service, general treatment from firm.
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
No actual reason given
Summary
They responded with an email saying I had broken rules, but did not actually cite any actual rules. Very unprofessional and a very obvious cash grab once I had finally gotten a funded account.
Documents From Reporter
4.3
Reviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$6K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
0
2
Different plans
sometimes they take a while to respond to emails.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
AustriaReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
0
1
No commentar
no comment
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
PakistanReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$6K
2 Steps
Less than 1 month
1
1
I like the dashboard most because it is user friendly.
FundedNext account logged out automatically after some time but that is not the part of trading.
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
200 Loyalty Points Welcome Bonus.
Sign up free to claim points, unlock rewards, save favorite firms, and start earning more through reviews and platform activity.