Reseñas de FundingPips

As explained earlier, they took my account and banned me from the whole firm after a reason I don’t know of. Long story short I got funded and made a payout early with funding pips when I started out. I went through psychological warfare and burnt many accounts until I finally calmed down again and started making progress, I get funded again within a week, made 2 598 USD profit and they tell me I violated CID and terms and services agreement. Don’t know when or why I did nothing different, and they won’t give me any reason no nothing. Just like that and they say the decision is final and will not change.

FundingPips permanently terminated my account, claiming that my Device ID matched another user's account. This is incorrect because I have never shared my device, never allowed anyone else to trade on my behalf, and have always operated my account independently. I requested evidence and a review, but I was not given a clear explanation before my account was closed. I understand the importance of enforcing rules, but such serious actions should be supported by clear evidence and a fair investigation. I hope FundingPips reviews my case and improves its process for handling these situations.

FundingPips terminated my Master Account, alleging that my Device ID (CID) matched another registered user on their platform. I categorically deny this allegation. I have never shared my account, device, login credentials, or trading environment with anyone. I did not use a VPS, Remote Desktop, copy trading, or any third-party account manager. I was the sole person operating my account. At the time my account was terminated, I had approximately $2,000 profit on a $50,000 Master Account and was progressing toward the required profit target. I repeatedly requested the evidence supporting their allegation and asked to escalate the matter or speak with the person responsible for the decision. FundingPips refused to provide any technical evidence, refused to explain what Device ID was allegedly matched, refused any further review or appeal, and stated that their decision was final. My concern is not only the account termination but also the lack of transparency. A serious allegation was made against me without any supporting evidence being disclosed or any meaningful opportunity to challenge the decision. I am submitting this review so that other traders are aware of my experience. I believe firms should provide a fair review process and give traders an opportunity to respond to allegations before permanently terminating an account.

Use many device,i have the same from 2 years and the last payout was approved 1 week ago and today the ban its absolutely no sense

My account was breached for exceeding the 2% Risk per Trade Idea limit on a 100k 2-Step Standard (10%) Master account. I exceeded this limit because I genuinely believed the rule had been removed from my account. Before placing the trade, I relied on FundingPips' official communications, including emails, Instagram posts, X posts, the Help Centre, and my trading dashboard, all of which indicated that the Risk per Trade Idea rule had been removed from 2-Step Standard Master accounts. One official Instagram announcement even stated that the change applied to new and existing accounts, while the Help Centre stated "2-Step Standard – All accounts – Not applicable." After my account was breached, Support informed me that the rule had only been removed for 8% profit target accounts and that it still applied to my existing 10% account. However, I could not find this distinction in any official documentation, and despite repeatedly requesting it, I was not provided with an official webpage or document showing that this exception had been communicated. Even today, the official Help Centre and the page linked from my breach notification do not state that the rule applies only to 8% accounts or that existing 10% accounts are excluded from the change. They simply state that the Risk per Trade Idea rule "no longer applies on 2-Step Standard accounts" or that it is "Not applicable" for all 2-Step Standard accounts, which continues to create confusion. I believe this breach resulted from relying on conflicting official information rather than intentionally violating the trading rules. I respectfully ask FundingPips to review my case, taking into account the official communications that were available to me, and to consider reinstating my account.