FundingPips Reviews

I would recommend Funding Pips to any Newbie and advanced trading because of their simplified dashboard very easy to use, quick response from their customer care and fast payouts.

I had a great experience with FundingPips. The evaluation process was clear and well-structured, which made it easier to stay focused and disciplined while trading. The rules are straightforward, and I liked the flexibility they offer compared to many other prop firms.

FundingPips offers a best 2 step evaluation with no time limits and fast payouts, making it a reliable, and low cost choice for managing and scaling the capital.

⚠️ WARNING: My Experience with FundingPips — Please Read Before You Join I want to share my story honestly because I believe traders deserve to make informed decisions about where they put their money and effort. I passed my FundingPips challenge, received a funded account, traded responsibly, and built a profit of $1,570 that was eligible for payout. I did everything right. Then my account was suddenly suspended. The reason? My brother — who has his own completely separate FundingPips account — used my personal Binance wallet address when requesting HIS payout, without my knowledge or consent. I had no idea this had happened until I received the suspension notice. I immediately contacted support and explained the situation clearly and respectfully. I offered to provide: ✅ Proof of ownership of the Binance wallet address ✅ A written statement from my brother confirming he used my address without my permission ✅ Any identity verification they required They refused to accept any evidence. After more than 10 emails, I was told the decision is final, my account is permanently closed, and I am banned from ever using FundingPips again — for something I did not do. My $1,570 in legitimately earned profits has been withheld with no fair review and no chance to defend myself. I am not here to be dramatic. I am here because I believe this is genuinely unfair treatment and other traders should be aware. If you are considering FundingPips, please take note of how they handle disputes. I am still hoping FundingPips will do the right thing. #FundingPips #PropFirm #FundedTrader #PropFirmReview

Funding Pips has been an exceptional company in propfirm industry. I have had a great experience trading on their platform. One of the aspects that I appreciate the most about Funding Pips is their commitment to make sure their clients are happily satisfied. Their professionalism and reliability in handling payments have truly made them stand out. I feel respected and valued as a trader, knowing that my hard work is acknowledged and compensated in a timely manner. I have found Funding Pips to be a trustworthy and commendable company that prioritizes its traders satisfaction.

they doing a great job about payout and spreads, but they have to reform that %3 floating pnl in one pair.. and maybe allowed to news trading on step 2 acc.

I’ve been using FundingPips for a while now, and overall it’s been a solid experience. The platform is pretty straightforward to navigate, which is great if you don’t want to waste time figuring things out. I liked their evaluation process it feels fair compared to some other prop firms, and the rules are clearly explained. Payouts have been reliable so far, which is honestly one of the biggest concerns with any prop firm. Their support team is also responsive, although sometimes it can take a bit longer during busy periods. One thing I think could be improved is the dashboard it works fine, but a bit more detailed analytics would make it even better. Overall, FundingPips feels legit and trader-friendly. It’s not perfect, but definitely one of the better options if you’re looking to get into funded trading.

Title: KYC Issue Turned Into Permanent Ban – Support Was Useless My experience with FundingPips has been extremely disappointing, not just because of the KYC issue, but because of how poorly it was handled. During KYC, their system repeatedly misread my address details (e.g. “2B” as “28”, “LTG” as “LTS”), which forced me to retry submissions multiple times just to get accurate data. Instead of resolving this, my account was flagged for “duplicate applicant” and permanently restricted. The bigger issue is the support. I reached out multiple times, explained everything clearly, and even provided context about the OCR errors. However, all I received were the same repeated template responses: * “Violation confirmed” * “Decision is final” * "Unfortunately, as these are internal compliance requirements, we are unable to provide any further clarification." It felt like the support team wasn’t actually reviewing my case at all—just copying and pasting the same response regardless of what I said. They also claimed the issue was from a third-party KYC provider, but at the same time refused to escalate or request any manual review. This leaves users completely stuck when the system makes a mistake. To be clear, this was only a small 10k account. There would be no logical reason for me to attempt any kind of “cheating” on such a small account, which makes the accusation even harder to understand. Key concerns: * Faulty KYC system with OCR errors * False compliance flags triggered by retries * No transparency on what the actual violation was * Support that does not address the core issue at all I am a genuine user who followed their process exactly. Getting permanently banned without any proper explanation or second chance is unacceptable. If this is how edge cases are handled, users should be aware of the risk. Be cautious when doing KYC — system errors alone can cost you your account.

I want to warn other traders about a critical rule at FundingPips that is very easy to misunderstand in real trading. Their “2% Risk Per Trade Idea” rule is not as simple as it sounds. Like most traders, I understood this as a limit on open (floating) risk. On my first day trading the master account, I managed my positions accordingly: * Closed trades were around $600 loss * Open trades were around $1,100 floating loss * I kept my stop loss within what I believed was the 2% limit Despite this, my account was breached. Later, support explained that they combine closed losses + open losses and even group trades together as a single “trade idea” if you re-enter in the same direction within a short time (in my case, 10 minutes). This means your previous losses continue to count against you, even after trades are closed. This is not intuitive and can easily catch traders off guard—especially on a first day. What made it worse: After I posted a review on Trustpilot, they publicly said they are willing to help. I contacted support as instructed, but the response was simply that the decision is final with no reconsideration. So there is a clear gap between public communication and actual outcome. I’m not against rules, but rules like this should be explained much more clearly with real examples. If you’re considering this firm, make sure you fully understand how they define “trade idea” and how losses are calculated—because what looks like controlled risk to you may be calculated very differently on their side.

fundinngpips is a very nice prop firm and i can recommend it for very tight spreads, the rules are simple and clear and a very clear dashboard that is easy to use.