FundingPips Reviews

Good customer care, the spread is friendly, i didnt reach payout but its a. Good company for real trader with consistency system of trading also the price is friendly

Worst experience with this firm, I had four accounts, and they suspended all putting false allegations on me about IP changes, copy trading and accounts management. After passing both phases and KYC, they accused me that my IP address is changed which resolved later with the proofs I provided. Later I started the Master account, they banned me saying I violated the terms - accusing that I copy trade/ account managements. My trades match with another user without even proofs, I requested multiple times for an interview to clarify the issue, but they denied each time. Regarding refunds, they just issued one refund, no refund for the rest of the accounts since someone is managing those accounts, without even a single proof. I'd request everyone to stay away - sooner or later they will be same as TFT or SFT.

I signed up for FundingPips' 2-Step Model, met all the trading requirements, and followed the rules, yet I was falsely banned under the claim of "copy trading," which I did not engage in. Prior to the ban, I had conversations with multiple moderators who confirmed that my trading activity did not violate any prohibited strategies, yet I was still removed unfairly. I have also seen other traders accused of the same violations receive their payouts, which makes this decision inconsistent and highly suspicious. My account balance was $6,384.53, and I was supposed to receive a payout of $1,107.62, which has not been processed despite my compliance. When I raised this issue with customer support, I was redirected to the risk team, who provided no clear justification or evidence of wrongdoing. I even presented screenshots proving that my trades were held for longer than a minute, contradicting the accusation of copy trading, yet my case remains ignored. This is completely unacceptable, as FundingPips operates on demo master accounts, meaning they are profiting off failed challenges rather than real liquidity. Given this structure, my payout should either be processed or the profit should be removed, but banning me entirely is unjust. This kind of behavior raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of the platform, as they seem to be arbitrarily banning traders after they become profitable to avoid payouts. I demand fairness, transparency, and either a full review of my case or the immediate release of my pending funds. THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. If I receive my payout or my profit is removed and my account is reinstated, I will reconsider my review. As of now, my account (D#981071) remains banned under false accusations of copy trading, which is completely baseless. I HAVE NO OTHER FRIENDS WHO TRADE, AND MY TRADES ARE LIVE STREAMED. I am extremely frustrated that FundingPips has banned me under a false claim that I have never engaged in with any prop firm. Copy trading? Are you serious? Response to FundingPips’ Reply from previous review: Your response states that "the necessary proof is provided." However, out of the millions of trades placed on your platform each week, you selectively enforce a rule that falsely labels my trades as copy trading. You have failed to provide: 1.) The identity and location of the alleged other trader. I can guarantee that they do not live near me, nor do I have any contact with them. 2.) A logical explanation for why only 5 out of my 15 trades that day were labeled as copy trading while the other 10 were not. This inconsistency makes no sense. 3.) Any evidence that I own multiple accounts. I have been a loyal customer for 1.5 years, operating under a single account. A proper KYC check would confirm that I have no other accounts associated with me. Furthermore, you manipulated the evidence. You edited the screenshot you provided, cutting out trades in the middle to make it appear as though I was copy trading. Before you deleted my account, I took my own screenshots, which clearly show that I was not engaging in copy trading. How does it make sense that after spending 1.5 years working toward getting funded on the same account, I would suddenly risk it all by engaging in copy trading immediately after receiving funding? I fully expect FundingPips to respond to this review without providing any legitimate evidence to support their claim. Before you reply, answer my questions: 1.) Who is the individual I supposedly copy traded with, and where are they located? I will tell you that 110% they do not live near me. 2.) Why were only 5 out of my 15 trades flagged, while the other 10 were not, this is inconsistent with your claim. 3.) Why was my account permanently banned despite my long-standing compliance and a clean record? I expect a fair and transparent resolution. Either reinstate my account and adjust my profit accordingly, or process my pending payout. Anything less is a clear indication that FundingPips is deliberately avoiding payouts by falsely banning profitable traders. Fundingpips, I am trying to be reasonable and have been trying to keep it professional through emails and trust pilot reviews, however this is the first time I think ever in my life I have been falsly accused by a propfirm, which is why I need to talk with someone in a professional environment.

I was falsely accused and permanently banned as a client by Funding Pips for alleged copy trading — based on just one trade that looked similar to another trader’s. I have never traded in concert with anyone. I am a legitimate trader, with over $75,000 in payouts from different prop firms during my first year of trading. I also run a public Telegram community with 500+ subscribers, where I’ve openly shared my trading strategy, results, and ideas. This is the firm where I bought my first accounts. One year later, when I became profitable with other firms, I came back here and reached my first $100K live account with them. When I had earned enough profit for my third payout, I bought two more $100K challenges. But before my third payout was processed, I was permanently banned as a client. You can review my full email communication with the Funding Pips Responsible Trading Team. I provided multiple pieces of evidence and offered several ways to prove my trading independence — including my full strategy journal, execution timestamps, and explanations of my trade logic. I also asked them many specific questions to clarify their decision and even offered to do a call, interview, or anything else that would help. But they did not answer a single question. Not one. They refused to engage in any dialogue or consider evidence. The entire process felt like a one-sided accusation with no real investigation — as if the decision had already been made. Being treated this way by a firm so widely trusted in the community was incredibly disappointing. Out of all the firms I’ve worked with, Funding Pips was the last one I expected this from. Here are my arguments proving I did not copy trade: 1. Only one trade was flagged out of many. I’ve made dozens of trades across both challenges and the live phase. I have journaled them all and can prove I took similar positions at the same time with other prop firms. Claiming copy trading from one swing trade overlap is absurd. 2. I shared my public journal of trades, all following the same logic: wait for a POI (1–4H FVG/Liquidity raid) → 15m FVG inversion → enter either with a market or limit order. It shows a consistent, independent strategy. It is also very simple, anyone can use it as it is widely known concepts and timeframes. 3. I have a public community where I’ve explained my strategy. It’s entirely possible someone used it. 4. The flagged trade was an obvious swing setup: I placed a buy limit order at a clear 5m FVG test level and left it, I can't control the execution time, and set TP at the most obvious liquidity pool where a correction might start. 5. There is no other evidence of copy trading — no IP overlaps, no location matches, nothing. They provided nothing else, so it’s safe to assume there is none. 6. I asked if the other trader was also banned for copy trading. If not — why was I? My buy limit order was placed about 30 minutes before execution, so timing differences are irrelevant. 7. Can you imagine a copy-trading arrangement where both traders hold a trade for almost a week, but enter and exit within 1 minute of each other on purpose? It makes no sense. When I had no other options, I tried to reach the CEO, Khaled, but had no luck. He often states that Funding Pips has “0 reward denials” — which is technically true. But he doesn’t mention that they can pay you out and then instantly ban you as a client afterward. This isn’t just about money — it’s about trust, and the fact that there are very few legitimate firms offering large two-step allocations like this. I filed a chargeback with my bank — not for failed challenges (I had a couple), but for one funded account and two newly purchased challenges. One of these cases has already been processed and I received my money back. If I weren’t in the right, that would be financial fraud — something I would never risk, especially while publicly announcing it. As I’ve stated in emails, I would stand by my case under oath in court. I’m speaking out not out of anger, but to make other traders aware.Be careful who you trust.

Today I got received an email related to reverse trading and got banned which i didn't dou know they accuse me of reverse trading from other user(they don't even specifiy me ) they have many users in their platform who could trade against me

Sudden Leverage Reduction to 1:2 After Passing Funded Accounts – Unfair & Unprofessional I’m writing this review to highlight what I believe is an unfair and unreasonable action taken by FundingPips. After successfully passing two funded accounts and following all of their rules, FundingPips suddenly imposed a forced leverage reduction to 1:2 on my master accounts. This was done after I proved I could trade profitably and responsibly. Their explanation was “risk management”, but I was already compliant with their rules and had no violations at all. Leverage restrictions should be part of the initial terms, not something a prop firm can change after a trader becomes profitable. Changing the trading conditions midway—especially after passing multiple funded challenges—feels like a selective and unfair penalty. Traders who perform well should not be punished for their success. This decision negatively affects my ability to trade the strategy that allowed me to pass in the first place. It also raises questions about whether the firm is penalizing consistent traders to avoid future payouts. A proper prop firm should reward skill, follow transparent rules, and not modify leverage “after the fact” without legitimate grounds. I hope FundingPips reconsiders this approach, because actions like this damage trust and discourage serious traders from staying with the firm. Prop firms should operate with consistency, fairness, and respect for traders who meet their requirements.

My FundingPips account was abruptly and permanently suspended after being accused of copy trading, account management, and “trading in concert with others.” These accusations are completely false. The only “evidence” provided was one single trade on USDJPY, compared with another account. Even in that example, the trades clearly show different entry times, different exit times, and different prices. That fact alone rules out copy trading or coordinated execution. Trading the same highly liquid instrument on the same day is apparently enough for FundingPips to terminate an account. By that logic, a huge percentage of traders should be banned, which makes this enforcement look arbitrary and careless. I consistently close trades before the end of the trading day as part of my risk approach. Differences in timing and duration are normal and expected and do not indicate any form of coordination. FundingPips failed to provide any technical or objective proof, such as: - Identical execution timing - Synchronized trade structure - Shared IP addresses, devices, or APIs - Any verifiable linkage between accounts Instead of a proper investigation or an opportunity to clarify, FundingPips enforced a “zero tolerance” suspension and immediately terminated my account without transparency or fair review. This experience seriously damages trust. It feels like accounts can be removed based on weak assumptions rather than solid evidence, which is extremely concerning for any trader considering this company. I would strongly caution others to think carefully before committing time and effort to FundingPips.

My time with this firm has been a plethora of amazing experiences one of which was the time when they were delisted from MT5 cause of license issues.. But how they held it together and came back stronger is something that'd live rent free in my memory.. Clock it 😁

Due transparency rules and started trading journey with FP and the most interesting part is daily drawdown limit is very helpful which gives me space in order to recover the losses. Dashboard is also very helpful which gives me details of the account. Thanks to FP

Funding Pips is Trust Worthy and has a good reputation of giving payouts. But I found the spreads to be a bit fluctuating in gold. The spreads are less but the candle movement is too volatile compared to other firms. This results in booking lesser profits or your stop loss getting hit if you have strict stop loss. I will recommend fundingpips for everyone except scalpers.