FundingPips Reviews

One of the best prop firms out there. ❤️‍🔥 Thank you for your existence and for giving traders like me the opportunity to prove ourselves. What started with a $10K account has turned into $25K+ in total payouts in less than one year. 🤯💰 It’s honestly crazy to look back and see how far this journey has come. There have been plenty of losses, setbacks, stressful days, and moments where I questioned everything—but staying consistent, trusting my edge, managing risk, and continuing to show up made the difference. I’m genuinely grateful for the opportunity and everything I’ve learned along the way. This journey has taught me that you don’t need to win every trade—you just need to stay disciplined and let the edge play out over time. Here’s to many more payouts, bigger accounts, and hopefully an even crazier journey ahead. 🥂📈 $10K → $25K+ payouts in under a year. Still just getting started

I'm using funding pips around a year and i have breached 5 accounts of them all in second phase still not funded with them But definitely will try again and get funded with them one of my friend is funded and have taken payouts with FP once he breached his account in master account with some profit but funding pips gave his profit to him and then breached his account actually a good firm.

Passed a 2-Step Standard evaluation, got a Master Account, and received a real payout from it — no issues, no warnings. One week later, right before a much larger payout was due, the account was permanently terminated over a "Device ID match" report. I asked their Responsible Trading Team three separate times to either point to the exact clause I supposedly broke, show actual evidence of a prohibited action on that account, or reverse the decision. Never got an answer to any of the three — just "decision is final," repeated by different agents. If you're approaching a large payout, know that this can happen with no real explanation given, even after months of clean trading and a documented payout history.

I mean when i was first introduced into propfirms, my first ever firm was fundingpips and when i requested the payout at very first account i was in fear. But got my first ever payout on same day and literally i traded like i was trading in a broker while i didn't know enough rules that other firms made hidden like martingale, margin rules etc etc.. But fundingpips didn't have one. So getting first payout on fundingpips was the best experience I've so far.

My first successful prop. Good prop, successful first payout!! Transparent rules to follow. Would hope for a better scaling program in the future though.

I took my first trade on a 1-step flex funded challenge, got stopped out on XAUUSD with some slippage (normal, I don't dispute that), and my MT5 trade history shows a realised loss of $2,932 - under the 3% ($3,000) Daily Loss Limit. My account was still permanently closed for an alleged breach of $3,040, based entirely on an internal "floating equity" figure that only ever existed on their servers. Here's the specific problem I raised with support, which they never actually answered across three replies: My stop loss was set at 4,376.48. Their own dashboard shows the "breach price" as 4,375.39 - a price BELOW my stop loss. My order then filled at 4,375.57 - a HIGHER price than their own stated breach price. If price genuinely traded down to 4,375.39 (which is what triggered their breach, on their account), a resting stop order should fill at or near that point, not at a better price afterwards. Their own numbers describe a sequence that doesn't match normal order execution logic, and when I asked them directly to explain the mechanics, I got the same explanation restated three times: that equity is monitored on a floating basis, not final realized loss. When I asked for the tick-by-tick price data or the equity log to actually verify the breach, they refused to provide it, stated there was "no issue," and closed the escalation with no route to a dealing/risk team. I understand slippage happens, I understand daily loss limits are calculated on floating equity rather than closed P&L. What I'm disputing is that FundingPips has provided zero verifiable evidence for a specific, internally inconsistent breach claim, has refused a reasonable request for the underlying data, and has permanently closed my account and forfeited my challenge fee on that basis. If you're considering FundingPips, be aware that if you're closed out on a marginal breach, you have no way to verify the numbers they give you, and no independent recourse if you disagree.

They are a good firm Good firm I like their trading condition it’s just good very low spread on xauusd and I liked it so much fast credentials haven’t gotten a pay out on this firm but they have the potential to go firm they are now my favorite firm

i was just hour away from requesting my profit when they send me an email and close all of my trading accounts worth $50.000 and reject $2000 of my profit. they told me your device is used by 2 other user in our platform. I WANT TO BE %100 CLEAR: IT IS LIe. NO one uses my laptop ,i boght it from company brand new and i have this laptop since 4 years ago so it is imposible. when i ask them for proof they send me an automated PDF that you and some guy from Turkey AND some guy from Bahrain have same device! while i am in INDIA !

Pros: Payouts are fast (had one processed in minutes). Evaluation rules are workable, good flexibility on trading style/days. Solid instrument range (XAUUSD, indices, majors). Minor downside: Occasional slippage on entries during fast moves, especially on NDX100/GER40 — nothing dealbreaking, just something to factor into risk management. Net take: reliable firm, fast payouts, would recommend without hesitation.

I have been a FundingPips customer for a considerable period of time, successfully completing multiple challenges, reaching the funded Master stage, and receiving several payouts. Unfortunately, my recent experience has been extremely disappointing and has raised serious concerns about the company’s transparency and fairness. I currently have two affected One Step Master accounts: * Account #20031387, created on June 1, 2026. * Account #20395118, created on July 16, 2026. Both accounts were purchased under the Bi-Weekly reward cycle, and both had a scheduled reward availability date of October 8, 2026. However, approximately one day before I was due to request my payouts, FundingPips unexpectedly suspended trading on both accounts and informed me that I was required to switch to the new Monthly reward cycle. This was not optional. FundingPips explicitly confirmed that trading would remain disabled until I accepted the new conditions. The new Monthly cycle introduces substantial additional requirements, including a 35% consistency rule, at least seven profitable trading days with a minimum profit of 0.5% of the starting account size per qualifying day, and a reduced 1% Striking System warning threshold. These conditions were not applicable to my accounts when I purchased them. Most importantly, FundingPips confirmed in writing that both accounts had been purchased before the introduction of the Monthly reward cycle, but stated that the new requirements would nevertheless apply because its internal trading review occurred afterward. I find this extremely concerning, particularly because I had already generated profits under the original conditions. On one account, based on my calculations, meeting the newly imposed 35% consistency requirement could require approximately $20,000 in total profit before I become eligible to withdraw my existing rewards. This effectively forces me to continue taking additional trading risks to access profits that I had already generated. FundingPips justified the decision by referring to a review conducted by its Responsible Trading Team under Section 9 of its Terms and Conditions. However, despite repeatedly requesting clarification, I have not received specific information identifying which trades were considered problematic, which objective criteria were applied, or why both accounts were selected. Instead, customer support has repeatedly explained the new Monthly cycle without addressing my actual questions. Another concern is that FundingPips previously promoted the possibility of generating profits through a single trade. I therefore find it difficult to understand why my trading performance is now being used to justify restrictions that significantly affect my payout eligibility. I proposed a reasonable solution: allow me to receive my already scheduled payouts under the original Bi-Weekly conditions, and apply any new requirements only to future trading activity. FundingPips did not agree to this proposal and maintained that the transition was mandatory. Even more concerning, my dashboard continued to display “Reward Cycle Biweekly” and “Reward available since October 8, 2026” while both accounts were marked as suspended and trading was disabled. I believe this situation raises serious questions about retroactive changes to payout conditions, transparency of internal compliance decisions, and fair treatment of existing customers. I am not claiming that FundingPips has been proven to engage in fraudulent activity. However, based on my documented experience, I am extremely dissatisfied with the handling of this situation. I hope Prop Firm Match will review these concerns and encourage FundingPips to provide a transparent explanation and a fair resolution, particularly regarding the profits generated before the new restrictions were imposed.