New Giveaway Available →New Giveaway Available →
Reviews1101
Sort by
4.3
INReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
I’ve been using FundingPips for a while now, and overall it’s been a solid experience. The platform is pretty straightforward to navigate, which is great if you don’t want to waste time figuring things out. I liked their evaluation process it feels fair compared to some other prop firms, and the rules are clearly explained. Payouts have been reliable so far, which is honestly one of the biggest concerns with any prop firm. Their support team is also responsive, although sometimes it can take a bit longer during busy periods. One thing I think could ...
N/A
0
Dashboard
It’s nothing major, but these are the areas where I think the firm could improve.
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
TRReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
they doing a great job about payout and spreads, but they have to reform that %3 floating pnl in one pair.. and maybe allowed to news trading on step 2 acc.
Less 1 Month
0
4
quick and trustable payouts
not allowed to news trading and %3 floating rule on step 2 acc.
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
RWReviews
2.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
⚠️ WARNING: My Experience with FundingPips — Please Read Before You Join I want to share my story honestly because I believe traders deserve to make informed decisions about where they put their money and effort. I passed my FundingPips challenge, received a funded account, traded responsibly, and built a profit of $1,570 that was eligible for payout. I did everything right. Then my account was suddenly suspended. The reason? My brother — who has his own completely separate FundingPips account — used my personal Binance wallet address when reques...
Less 1 Month
3
0
The platform was easy to use and the challenge conditions were fair and transparent.
Their dispute resolution process is non-existent. They send copy-paste responses, refuse to review evidence, and make final decisions without giving traders a genuine opportunity to explain their situation.
4.0
User Friendliness
2.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
2.0
Trading Conditions
May 7, 2026
Dear Junior, Thank you for sharing your experience and for the respectful way you have engaged throughout this process. We want to be transparent about why this decision was made. When submitting a reward request, all traders confirm that the wallet address provided is solely owned and used by them. In your case, the wallet address submitted was found to be linked to another user's account on our platform. Regardless of the circumstances behind this — whether intentional or not — this constitutes a breach of our policy, as the confirmation given at the time of submission states that the address is exclusively yours. We understand you have explained that your brother used your wallet address without your knowledge, and we acknowledge that this was presented honestly. However, we are unable to verify the intent behind a shared wallet address, and our policy exists to protect the security and integrity of our platform for all traders. As confirmed in our communication, your earned reward will still be processed. The account restriction itself is a result of the policy breach and has been applied in accordance with our terms. We are sorry this has been such a distressing experience. The decision stands. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.3
PKReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
funding pips is the most credible propfirm the only problem is thier spread and slippage otherwise it's a trusted firm i failed challenge because of my mistake i will suerly tried them again
N/A
0
spread and slippage
transparency and credibility
4.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
3.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
INReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Super Impressed with the Dashboard and quick service , this is my 4th account, The Monthly competitions are great , Hopeful for a payout this time for sure .
N/A
0
Dashboard and Service
Drawdown
5.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
5.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
NGReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
The spread is good and their dashboard user friendly U can navigate around ... customer care is good but I never talk to agent it automated... And I have not yet receive payout but looking forward in doing so
N/A
0
Spread
Customer care wheh I want to talk to an agent
4.0
User Friendliness
3.0
Payout Process
3.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
INReviews
4.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$50K
2 Steps
The only one which is giving payout without any issues. What I wanna say is guys lets take payout as much as we can while fundingpips is doing good things for us. Thanks fundingpips love pls grow more so that we the traders can grow more n more.
1 Month +
0
1
good customes service and good props firm and good price
The only one which is giving payout without any issues. What i wanna say is guys lets take payout as much as we can while fundingpips is doing good things for us. Thanks fundingpips ♥️ pls grow mpre so that we the traders can grow mpre n more.
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
4.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
PKReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$100K
2 Steps
I want to warn other traders about a critical rule at FundingPips that is very easy to misunderstand in real trading. Their “2% Risk Per Trade Idea” rule is not as simple as it sounds. Like most traders, I understood this as a limit on open (floating) risk. On my first day trading the master account, I managed my positions accordingly: * Closed trades were around $600 loss * Open trades were around $1,100 floating loss * I kept my stop loss within what I believed was the 2% limit Despite this, my account was breached. Later, support explained t...
N/A
0
Their on demand payout option with 90% profit split
Horrible and robotic customer support
1.0
User Friendliness
1.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
1.0
Trading Conditions
May 6, 2026
Dear Syed, Thank you once again for sharing your experience, and we recognise this is your third review on this matter. We have addressed your concerns in detail through our previous responses, and we want to reiterate the key points clearly. The Risk Per Trade Idea rule combines both realised and unrealised losses across positions grouped under the same trade idea — including positions opened in the same direction within 10 minutes of closing a losing trade. This is documented in our FAQ with examples, and all traders agree to our Terms and Conditions which incorporate the FAQ as part of the binding ruleset. Regarding the gap between our public response and the support outcome — directing you to support was intended to provide you with a detailed breakdown of your account data, not to imply any reconsideration of the decision. We apologise if that expectation was not set clearly enough. We genuinely hear your feedback on rule clarity and appreciate that you have raised it constructively across multiple reviews. This kind of feedback helps us improve how we communicate our rules to traders. However, the breach has been thoroughly verified and the decision remains final. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.3
MYReviews
1.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$10K
2 Steps
Title: KYC Issue Turned Into Permanent Ban – Support Was Useless My experience with FundingPips has been extremely disappointing, not just because of the KYC issue, but because of how poorly it was handled. During KYC, their system repeatedly misread my address details (e.g. “2B” as “28”, “LTG” as “LTS”), which forced me to retry submissions multiple times just to get accurate data. Instead of resolving this, my account was flagged for “duplicate applicant” and permanently restricted. The bigger issue is the support. I reached out multiple times...
Less 1 Month
0
3
Trading conditions
non helpful support
4.0
User Friendliness
4.0
Payout Process
1.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
Reason
Breach Reason
KYC Violation
Summary
KYC system misread my documents, forcing multiple retries. This triggered a false “duplicate applicant” and “device mismatch” flag, leading to a permanent ban without explanation or review.
Documents From Reporter
May 7, 2026
Dear Teoh, Thank you for the additional detail, and we want to address your concerns as transparently as we can. We acknowledge that OCR misreads can occur during automated verification, and we are sorry for the confusion this caused during your submission process. However, the decision to permanently restrict your account was made by our independent third-party KYC provider based on their verification outcome — specifically a duplicate applicant flag. This is not a decision we can override, as we respect the findings of our KYC provider as part of our compliance obligations. We understand your frustration with the support responses you received. We hear that you felt the replies were template-based and did not engage with the specifics of your situation. While we cannot change the outcome in this case, your feedback on the quality of the support interaction is noted and taken seriously. Regarding manual review — as communicated through your support interactions, the KYC provider’s decision is final and we are unable to request an override on their behalf. We are sorry this experience has been so frustrating, particularly for a small account where there was clearly no intent to mislead. The decision stands. Best regards, FundingPips Team
4.3
TZReviews
5.0
Trader’s Satisfaction
$5K
2 Steps
Funding pips is amongst the solid propfirm, it's generally cool trading with them simple rules and terms smooth trading environment all challenge phase and instant one good tight spread no slippages fast execution
N/A
0
It's fast and smart working It knows what traders need As they say built for traders by traders
I like them as they are good
5.0
User Friendliness
5.0
Payout Process
5.0
Customer Care
4.0
Trading Conditions
4.3
1101
total reviews
5
640
4
311
3
50
2
17
1
83
4.3
1101
20% off all accounts — first order only
4.3
1101
20% off all accounts — first order only
